Parents hope their child will attend university, yet a degree does not guarantee a strong job or a high salary when the time comes. In fact, recent studies show that salaries for graduates who leave provincial campuses can vary dramatically, with some income levels nearly doubling in certain circumstances. This fluctuation highlights a larger trend: regional economies and workforce structures shape the value of a degree just as much as the credential itself.
New data from national employment authorities track graduates four years after graduation, using social security or payroll records to measure outcomes. The findings answer practical questions: how many graduates are employed after four years, how many remain unemployed, whether they work in fields related to their studies, and what salaries are typical for those jobs. These insights help students and families gauge potential return on investment and labor market alignment before choosing a program or a university.
Across the country, averages vary by institution and by regional economic fabric. For example, graduates from major universities may earn incomes that trend below the national average if the local economy relies more on industries with fewer high-skilled roles. One study shows typical first- to fourth-year earnings for university graduates around the national mean, while others exceed or fall short depending on the sector and geography. In general, the average income for graduates can differ by field of study and by the strength of the local job market.
When looking at broader categories, some fields consistently drive higher starting salaries. Health disciplines, including medicine, often lead the pack, with robust salaries and established credentialing pathways. Other high-earning areas include information technology, data science, and engineering, where graduates frequently land roles that require specialized training. Still, not all engineering tracks produce identical outcomes; some programs deliver stronger early career earnings than others, and some institutions may show broader salary ranges across their engineering offerings.
Teachers and education specialists, while essential, can have earnings that sit closer to the national average, depending on the school system and location. Professions in the arts, humanities, social sciences, and certain service-oriented fields may present more modest starting salaries but can offer other forms of professional fulfillment, ongoing education opportunities, and pathways to advancement as the economy evolves.
Within this landscape, certain fields of study consistently report higher early-career earnings, while others show more modest starts. Health professionals, computing specialists, and math-focused roles frequently rank among the top earners after four years. In contrast, careers tied to hospitality, tourism, and some education tracks may begin with lower salaries, even when graduates enter the workforce quickly. The differences often reflect how labor demand matches the supply of graduates with specific qualifications and the added value those professionals bring to their roles.
lower paid
On the other side, graduates from career or applied programs tied to service industries can face lower incomes in the early years post-graduation. For instance, those entering tourism or hospitality often see earnings well below the top tier, sometimes approaching half of what physicians or engineers earn in the same period. Education and certain humanities tracks can also trail the national average in early career stages, depending on local demand and the structure of local employers. Variations exist not only by field but also by the type of degree and the institution that issued it.
Experts explain these gaps through supply and demand dynamics and the value added by each profession. The number of qualified candidates plus the unique contributions graduates can bring to the labor market helps determine starting salaries. Over the longer term, many graduates do find roles aligned with their studies, but some fields see lower rates of field-specific employment, especially when the job market favors practical or technically oriented roles and when regional industries emphasize different skill sets.
Consequently, one key takeaway is the importance of aligning study choices with labor market demand. Universities are encouraged to expand capacities in programs that consistently attract employers and to offer guidance that helps students assess their own skills and the career paths those skills unlock. Prospective students should consider not only personal interest but also the recognized demand for their chosen field, the typical progression within that career, and the geographic opportunities available after graduation.
In practical terms, the dialogue between universities and employers matters. Policies that increase access to in-demand majors, alongside advice that helps students map their strengths to viable career trajectories, can improve outcomes. Ultimately, the goal is a workforce where graduates can apply their education in meaningful roles, contributing to the local economy while achieving personal and professional growth. This is the kind of alignment that benefits students, universities, and communities alike.