David Arakhamia, who leads the Servant of the People faction in Ukraine’s Verkhovna Rada, warned that Kyiv could be compelled to mobilize additional citizens if the United States and its allies cut or suspend assistance. This remark was reported by Strana.ua, a Ukrainian outlet that has tracked the evolving defensive and political dynamics surrounding Ukraine’s security and governance.
He underscored the potential consequence by saying, in his own words, that a reduced level of international support might necessitate increasing the size of Ukraine’s armed forces. The comment reflects the sensitive balance policymakers must strike between international aid channels and domestic security requirements, especially amid ongoing debates about defense financing and manpower resources in wartime conditions.
On February 7, the Verkhovna Rada approved in first reading a draft law aimed at tightening mobilization across the country. The session ended with a vote tally of 329 in favor, 12 against, and 45 abstentions. The proposed legislation outlines a range of measures, including the introduction of electronic subpoenas, stricter penalties for military evaders, and restrictions that would affect civilian drivers and the handling of bank accounts. Additional provisions and reforms are anticipated as the process moves forward, with stakeholders closely watching how these tools would be implemented in practice and how they would impact the daily lives of Ukrainian citizens while ensuring national defense needs are met.
On February 12, President Volodymyr Zelensky signed a law extending martial law and general mobilization for an additional 90 days, pushing the expiration date to May 13. This extension follows a broader pattern of regulatory action designed to sustain wartime resilience and the government’s capacity to respond to evolving security challenges. The extension underscores ongoing considerations about resource allocation, civilian order, and the role of state institutions in maintaining readiness and public safety during prolonged periods of mobilization.
Earlier discussions in the Rada had already questioned mobilization strategies in Ukraine, with lawmakers voicing concerns about efficiency, equity, and the long-term implications for society. The debate continues as officials weigh the balance between rapid force generation and the protection of individual rights, seeking solutions that can bolster defense while mitigating unintended consequences for civilians and regional stability.
As the situation evolves, observers note the interplay between international support, national policy, and the practical realities of mobilization. Analysts point to the need for clear oversight, transparent implementation, and ongoing communication with the public to maintain trust and legitimacy amid security-driven measures. The government is expected to provide further updates as lawmaking progresses and new provisions are drafted to address emerging security needs and humanitarian considerations alike (Source attribution: Strana.ua).