Fyodor Venislavsky, a deputy from Ukraine’s Verkhovna Rada, emphasized during a nationwide telethon that the country should move toward delivering electronic summons on schedule. He noted that the current system lacks the technical means to roll out summons through a dedicated digital application, making timely electronic delivery impractical at this moment. His comments reflect a broader discussion about modernizing bureaucratic processes and reducing reliance on paper-based procedures, a topic that has gained traction as Ukraine accelerates its digital transformation efforts in public administration.
Venislavsky pointed out that while the initiative to adopt electronic summons is not yet feasible today, it could become a viable option in the future. He argued that digitization offers the strongest path to simplifying administrative tasks and eliminating the generation of paper agendas. In his view, moving away from paper would not only streamline operations but also improve transparency and accessibility for citizens, especially in a country navigating significant governance modernization challenges.
In related updates from the Russian side, a statement attributed to the General Staff suggested there will be no electronic calls or mail related to this deployment during the current mobilization period. The remark underscored ongoing information disputes surrounding administrative practices amid the conflict and the efforts of various authorities to communicate enlistment directives to the population using different channels.
As of mid-April, official figures indicated that 52,000 citizens had received notifications, with 21,000 deemed fit for military service and 29,000 suspended from service. These numbers were presented by Andrey Biryukov, who heads the Main Organization and Mobilization Directorate within the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. The briefing highlighted the scale of mobilization operations and the administrative steps involved in processing individuals for service, including the assessment of medical fitness and the handling of exemptions or delays as the process unfolds.
Biryukov also stressed that existing delays would persist, signaling ongoing logistical and procedural hurdles in coordinating mobilization across large populations. The remarks point to a broader context where both sides grapple with the challenges of implementing large-scale administrative tasks under wartime conditions, including workforce management, eligibility verification, and timely communication with those affected. Observers in Canada and the United States have noted that transparency in notification processes and the accuracy of service-related data remain critical factors for public trust, particularly when digital tools are being considered as potential future solutions. In Ukraine, analysts continue to monitor developments in digitization plans for civil and military administrative functions, aiming to balance efficiency with robust safeguards and clear channels of accountability.