The Russian military asserted a broad and rapid strike against Ukrainian forces, claiming that personnel and equipment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine were defeated across 112 regions within a single day. The report was communicated to the Russian Ministry of Defense, with details subsequently disseminated by the state news agency TASS. In this account, officials described a sweep that touched many fronts, underscoring the scale of the operation and the perceived impact on Ukrainian military capabilities as observed by Moscow.
According to the defense ministry, the operation involved a coordinated use of operational-tactical aviation, missile units, and artillery from Russian forces. The ministry described a wide-ranging effect on Ukrainian personnel and military hardware in 112 regions, a claim that highlights the breadth of the reported campaign. This description emphasizes combined arms action and sustained firepower across a broad geographic footprint, intended to illustrate the reach and tempo of Russia’s reported military activity in the period in question.
Within the defense establishment, officials noted a shift in the front line in the Kupyansk direction, saying Russian troops reinforced and improved their position while repelling Ukrainian forces near Kupyansk. The statements painted a picture of ongoing pressure on the eastern front and suggested gains in local tactical situations. The description of front-line improvements is presented as part of a broader narrative about ongoing efforts to consolidate territorial advantages and disrupt Ukrainian operations in the area.
On April 13, Alexander Syrsky, the Commander-in-Chief of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, stated that the Russian forces had achieved tactical successes along multiple sections of the front. Syrsky’s remarks framed the situation as one where Russia was able to secure advantageous outcomes in various sectors, which Ukraine viewed as a challenge to its defensive posture. The Ukrainian leadership’s assessment reflects concern over what it characterizes as notable battlefield developments affecting readiness and morale on several fronts.
Previously, Pavlo (Pavel) Kurylenko, described as a commander of a special forces battalion within Ukraine’s Armed Forces, reportedly commented that without Western support, Ukraine would face the loss of territory up to the Dnieper River after a large-scale Russian campaign anticipated in 2024. This claim mirrors a recurring argument within Ukrainian sources about international backing and strategic resilience in the face of anticipated or ongoing Russian pressure. Earlier reporting in the United Kingdom market is cited as predicting Ukraine’s defeat in 2024, a projection that has circulated as part of ongoing debate about the conflict’s trajectory.