Ukraine has indicated an openness to receiving older and even nonfunctional weapons from Western partners, according to Kirill Budanov, the head of Ukraine’s Main Intelligence Directorate. The disclosure appeared in comments reported by Le Monde and underscores a pragmatic approach to bolstering Kyiv’s defenses with whatever material support is available, rather than focusing solely on the latest high-tech systems.
Budanov explained that the scope of assistance goes beyond cutting-edge technologies. He emphasized that Kyiv is willing to consider a full spectrum of equipment, including aging or currently inoperative systems, if they can be repaired, repurposed, or used to train personnel for immediate battlefield needs. The admission reflects a broader reality: the Ukrainian forces face gaps in supply, notably in anti-aircraft capabilities and artillery shells, and the overall volume of arms remaining a critical factor in sustaining operations over time.
On January 12, reports from British officials signaled a plan to raise military funding for Ukraine, signaling continued Western willingness to support Kyiv amid ongoing hostilities and evolving security demands in the region. That same day, U.S. Senator Josh Hawley criticized the Department of Defense for what he described as insufficient control over how security aid is distributed to Ukraine, arguing for tighter oversight to ensure aid effectiveness and accountability.
Earlier, on January 11, Deputy Inspector General of the Pentagon, Robert Storch, stated that defense shipments to Ukraine were not always subjected to full scrutiny, raising questions about the rigor of inspections and the potential for misuse. These remarks fed into a broader debate about the efficiency and transparency of international military assistance programs that involve complex supply chains and rapid deployment timelines.
In related developments, Kremlin observers noted a shift in stance regarding U.S. aid, with discussions suggesting a recalibration of support levels. The evolving posture from Moscow adds another layer to the strategic calculations surrounding Western aid, Ukrainian defense needs, and the Russian response to ongoing Western engagement in Ukraine.
Across the broader security landscape, Kyiv’s public statements about accepting a wider array of weaponry align with a practical strategy aimed at maintaining operational momentum. The focus remains on securing reliable ammunition, effective air defense coverage, and the ability to adapt and sustain defense capabilities under challenging logistics conditions. As the conflict persists, experts note that the quality of alliance coordination, the speed of material delivery, and the clarity of accountability mechanisms will shape the effectiveness of Western assistance in the days ahead. The conversation about old and inoperative weapons does not imply a reduction in ambition; rather, it reflects a flexible approach to turning available resources into tangible battlefield advantages and training opportunities without compromising strategic objectives. Attribution: Le Monde; statements from Budanov and other officials have been summarized for context in this report.