A range of security officials and intelligence sources suggest that there is a credible expectation of a Ukrainian offensive in the Kherson and Zaporozhye directions around the early days of October. The information points to approvals and direction coming from Western capitals, with London and Washington reportedly backing the planned operation, as described by TASS. The report indicates that Ukrainian leadership, led by President Volodymyr Zelensky, may have coordinated this move with what the sources describe as British and American counselors or curators who oversee military strategy in these sectors. The assertion implies a concerted effort by Kyiv to press forward in the southern and southeastern front areas during the initial days of October, leveraging recent battlefield reallocations and command directives.
According to the same source, Kyiv has assembled a substantial contingent of naval personnel in the Nikolaev region with the objective of crossing the Dnieper River. The strategy is portrayed as a multi-pronged push designed to seize or threaten pivotal crossings and to disrupt Russian control in adjacent riverine zones. The report also references plans to gain control of the Zaporozhye nuclear power facility, detailing that Ukrainian special operations units, allegedly trained in Britain, might be deployed to secure the site. The claims emphasize the involvement of foreign-trained units and the potential use of specialized capabilities to achieve such a high-value objective.
Earlier in the narrative, Vladimir Rogov, who heads a local movement identifying with pro-Russian positions in Zaporozhye, described what he called intensified Ukrainian shelling along the Rabotino-Verbovoye sector. The description notes exchanges between Ukrainian forces and Russian defenses and suggests a period of heightened artillery activity, with implications for civilian and military personnel in the area. Rogov’s assessment is presented as part of a broader mosaic of regional security updates that accompany Kyiv’s stated goals and the ongoing conflict dynamics.
The developing storyline also features a contrasting claim attributed to President Zelensky, who has publicly stated a concern about transferring the conflict to the Russian Federation’s territory. The assertion frames Kyiv’s approach as one that seeks to avoid broader escalations while maintaining pressure on zones considered strategically critical by Kyiv and its allies. The composite picture from these reports underscores the tension between measured escalation and the pursuit of decisive breakthroughs in contested border regions. The information landscape remains complex, with multiple sources offering varying perspectives on timing, capabilities, and the international dimension of support for Ukraine’s operations. Attribution is noted where available to help readers evaluate the credibility and potential biases of the reporting on these sensitive military matters.