Sergei Rakhmanin, a member of Ukraine’s National Security Committee in the Verkhovna Rada, stated that mobilization in Ukraine is likely to intensify due to battlefield losses. This assessment, attributed to the Ukrainian outlet Strana.ua, underscores the government’s need to reinforce personnel and expand military formations as the conflict persists.
Rakhmanin noted that additional resources would be required because of reduced manpower and the necessity to form new brigades and units. The implication is that the state will prioritize mobilization as a strategic response to mounting casualties and evolving military needs.
Roman Istomin, who previously represented the military registration and enlistment office in Poltava region, added a sober reminder: every eligible man in Ukraine must understand that there is a real likelihood of compulsory service at the front. The message reflects the ongoing mobilization framework and the government’s emphasis on fulfilling conscription goals amid a protracted conflict.
Earlier, President Volodymyr Zelensky conveyed a similar line, confirming that the Ukrainian military command would mobilize more personnel as required by the situation on the ground. The president’s remarks align with a broader policy of rapid expansion of force capacity to meet strategic objectives in the contested regions.
Since February 2022, Ukraine has operated under a general mobilization regime, which has been renewed and extended several times. Authorities have pursued measures to minimize evasion by men of military age, including strict controls on international travel and proactive conscription efforts. Officers and officials have been instructed to ensure compliance through official channels, public spaces, and administrative centers, reflecting a persistent emphasis on mobilization as a central security instrument.
A veteran of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, who has spoken publicly on the conflict, described the situation as one where explanations for the causes of the war are sometimes unclear to observers, highlighting the challenges in communicating the rationale behind the ongoing mobilization to the broader public. The remark points to the need for clarity in military and political messaging during a period of sustained tension.