Russia’s presidential press secretary outlined the sequence of events surrounding the May 30 drone incident over Moscow, framing the attack as a response from Ukraine. The spokesperson described the drone activity as Kiev’s reply to Moscow’s broader military actions, while briefing reporters on the situation.
During the briefing, it was explained that President Vladimir Putin began a busy day with high-priority consultations. Moscow’s mayor, Sergei Sobyanin, the head of the Moscow region, Andrei Vorobyov, and officials from the Ministry of Emergency Situations were among the first to be informed about the incident. The Kremlin reiterated that critical infrastructure and early warning systems were functioning as expected, while coordinating emergency and security responses across the capital. The tone suggested that authorities were maintaining a calm monitoring stance despite the disruption.
The Kremlin spokesperson commented that the attack appeared to be a direct reaction to Moscow’s recent operations aimed at disrupting Ukraine’s decision-making centers. While he did not provide additional details about the targets or the timing, he underscored the message that the strike was tied to ongoing exchanges that involve strategic centers within Ukraine. The public briefing emphasized the continuity of security measures and the preparedness of defense systems on this front.
In the morning updates, emergency services reported that drones struck two residential buildings. One incident occurred on Profsoyuznaya Street and the other on Atlasova Street in the New Moscow area. Local responders arrived quickly to assess damage and ensure the safety of residents, with medical teams on site to address any injuries or health concerns among those present near the crashes. The affected families received support and information about available assistance as authorities worked to restore normalcy in the neighborhood.
Official data indicated that multiple drones participated in the attack, with the defense ministry noting that several were intercepted or repelled by air defense assets. The authorities stressed that protective measures remained active and a continuous post-incident assessment was underway to determine the full scope of the threat and any potential repeat attempts. The incident prompted ongoing vigilance among security agencies and public safety organizations to minimize disruption and protect residents in adjacent districts.
Meanwhile, Ukrainian officials issued statements asserting that Kiev was not directly responsible for the Moscow drone strikes. The clarification came through an advisor to Ukraine’s presidential office, who emphasized that the actions in Moscow were not officially attributed to Kyiv, even as the broader context of the conflict continued to unfold. Observers noted the sometimes blurred lines in attribution during rapid developments, underscoring the importance of verifiable information from official channels as the situation evolves.