According to data compiled by consumer protection authorities in the United States, the typical loss reported by individuals in cryptocurrency fraud cases sits around $1,900 (about €1,767). Global analyses by Chainalysis show that losses tied to digital currencies reached tens of billions in 2021. In Spain, while exact figures are not available, experts estimate that between 250,000 and 400,000 people have fallen prey to crypto scams propelled by promises of extraordinary gains. Scammers target a broad audience using schemes like Ponzi setups, identity theft, and phishing—where deceptive messages pretend to be legitimate firms in order to obtain sensitive information. Regulators are familiar with these patterns.
Cryptocurrency-related crime has grown year after year. As one industry observer notes, usage of digital currencies has surged dramatically in recent years. Industry estimates place the number of global users well into the hundreds of millions, though precise counts vary. The International Monetary Fund has highlighted that overall market capitalization has surged into trillions of dollars, with a substantial portion circulating in Spain. Notable cases from 2021, such as large gaps tied to major platforms, illustrate the scale of losses worldwide. In Spain, episodes linked to platforms that later faced scrutiny have underscored the ongoing risk. Civilian authorities have observed a marked rise in these activities over the past several years, though investigations into specific companies can lag.
Industry sources describe the typical deception sequence. A common tactic is to present fake collateral or a bogus registration with a recognized regulator to foster trust. Registration on its own does not guarantee any level of protection for investors. Informants indicate that regulatory registries often show that an entity has the proper organizational framework to comply with anti-money laundering laws, but they do not constitute an audited endorsement of services. Experts warn that many firms may appear on official lists without conveying that such listings are not a validation of the offered services.
traditional methods renewed
Technology has empowered scammers to refresh old tricks. Civil Guard analysts describe a blend of social engineering with technical manipulation, including the creation of fake investment platforms to mislead users. Experts point out that cryptocurrency scams resemble frauds seen in other asset classes. Any device connected to the blockchain can process a transaction, which sometimes makes the scam faster and harder to detect.
Fraud remains a popular method for scammers because its reach is vast and the financial harm can be severe. Ponzi schemes promise outsized returns. In reality, initial payouts come from new participants who have fallen for the same trap. When the network grows large enough, organizers disappear, much like high-profile cases in the crypto space that drew global attention. Analysts note that scammers leverage social media, YouTube discussions, and online communities to lure victims. They may even masquerade as sweepstakes, contests, distant relatives, or storefronts that turn out to be fake.
Phishing and impersonation—where attackers pose as trusted institutions via email or phone to steal personal data—remain widespread. Victims are drawn into depositing progressively smaller sums as scammers pose as financial experts. Malicious messages can also deploy malware through fake text messages, stealing important information and personal data. Some crypto platforms claim to implement multiple security layers to protect users against such attacks.
Ignorance about the cryptocurrency market
Related news
Tracing the roots of large-scale crypto fraud points to the early growth of digital currencies around 2018. Early adopters helped spread awareness, while scammers learned to exploit gaps in regulation and investor education. Since then, financial watchdogs around the world have stepped up warnings about crypto risks. In the United States, regulatory priorities have evolved, and in Europe the Crypto Asset Markets Regulation (MiCA) is moving toward implementation. In Spain, authorities repeatedly caution that many crypto tokens and assets lack inherent value or reliable safeguards. Regulatory leaders emphasize that some products marketed under crypto labels should be approached with skepticism and thorough due diligence.
Regulatory actions continue to accelerate across jurisdictions. Governments are discussing measures to curb risks and improve transparency in digital asset markets. Observers note that clear rules can help reduce scams while preserving legitimate innovation. Upcoming regulatory frameworks aim to clarify the treatment of utility tokens, stablecoins, and non-fungible tokens, and to set standards for investor protection. The overarching message remains consistent: informed caution and solid verification are essential when dealing with digital assets.