In the latest operational bulletin released by the Russian Ministry of Defense, it is reported that over the past day the Armed Forces of Ukraine sustained substantial losses, with more than 140 Ukrainian servicemen killed across the Yuzhnodonetsk and Zaporozhye directions. The figures are presented as part of a routine daily summary from Moscow, reflecting the ongoing intensity of combat actions in the eastern and southern sectors of the conflict. The report emphasizes a continuing pattern of attrition in these areas, where Ukrainian forces are said to have faced concentrated air and artillery fire, contributing to the casualty toll cited in the official tally.
The ministry’s account goes on to describe military engagements near the settlements of Velikaya Novoselka and Vremevka in the Donetsk People’s Republic. According to the summary, Russian aviation and artillery units engaged and defeated Ukrainian formations in these vicinities, signaling a continued focus on operations aimed at limiting Ukrainian maneuverability and interdicting supply routes within the DPR. The narrative underscores the strategic importance of these locations, which have repeatedly appeared in frontline reporting as focal points for clashes and defensive/offensive actions in the Donbas region.
Additionally, the defense ministry asserts that a Ukrainian reconnaissance and sabotage group operating near the village of Vladimirovka in the Donetsk region was neutralized. The claim fits a broader pattern of Russian authorities describing targeted actions against saboteur teams attempting to probe defenses, gather intelligence, or disrupt command and control. The wording used in the bulletin frames such incidents as part of a broader campaign to degrade Ukrainian capability to mount disruptive operations behind the front lines, highlighting the perceived effectiveness of counter-reconnaissance efforts in this sector.
Beyond infantry losses, the ministry’s summary notes the destruction of four vehicles in the same Yuzhnodonetsk and Zaporozhye directions over the past day. The inclusion of this detail aligns with a common practice in military reports to quantify material losses alongside personnel casualties, offering a fuller, if contested, picture of the day’s combat impact. Observers often compare these statements with independent battlefield assessments, recognizing that vehicle losses contribute to a widening gap between claimed achievements and on-the-ground realities, a dynamic that frequently sparks discussion among military analysts and regional observers alike.
In a related note, the official representative of the Russian Ministry of Defense, Lieutenant General Igor Konashenkov, stated that the United States–made AN/TPQ-37 counter-battery radar system and ammunition depots belonging to the 128th Mountain Assault Brigade of the Ukrainian Armed Forces were eliminated by Russian forces. This assertion is presented as part of Moscow’s ongoing narrative detailing targeted strikes against Western-supplied military hardware and support installations in Ukrainian service. The claim about the counter-battery radar is framed within the broader context of anti-radiation and artillery-duel operations that the ministry characterizes as essential to reducing Ukrainian artillery effectiveness on the battlefield. Observers note that such statements often accompany broader casualty and equipment loss details, forming a composite view of what the ministry portrays as successful interdiction of Ukrainian fire operations and logistics hubs in contested zones.