In northern Syria, countless lives remain buried under debris, with survivors across the Turkish border forced to confront loss while seeking relief and a path to healing. Across the region, Syrians reflect on a catastrophe that left nearly 40,000 people dead in both lands, and many wonder if those in power truly grasp the scale of the tragedy. Amid grief and accusation, Bashar al-Assad appears to navigate a moment of calculated perhaps even improbable diplomacy as aid flows begin to land again from Western states and other partners. These moves arrive after a relief surge that touched governments accustomed to a long history of distant engagement with Damascus. Reporters and analysts note that aid was essential for survival, and discussions with the Assad administration have opened new channels for relief operations and reconstruction planning that were previously stalled by political rancor and isolation.
According to the Center for Justice and Accountability for Syria, the president’s response to the disaster is being scrutinized as a test of governance and accountability. The executive director of the center emphasizes that while cross-border aid faced significant obstruction, the relief effort also shaped the Assad regime’s international image and influence during a period of extended isolation. Observers note that the catastrophe coincided with a broader shift in global attention, bringing foreign diplomacy back to Damascus after years of tension and suspicion.
The president’s travels extend beyond Damascus, with testimony that he has visited Gulf states in search of support and legitimacy. A recent trip to Oman, following a visit to the United Arab Emirates, signals a broader regional recalibration where former adversaries reassess their stance toward Syria. Analysts contend that the region has begun to acknowledge a durable reality: Syria has reemerged as a regional actor, and many governments now prefer pragmatic engagement over long-term estrangement. Social media commentary from regional observers underscores the sense that Assad’s government has steadied itself in ways unseen in years, while cautions remain about the long road ahead for reconciliation and reconstruction.
Senior leaders from Egypt and Bahrain reportedly reached out within hours of the earthquake to offer support, mirroring statements by Martin Griffiths, the United Nations humanitarian chief, who met with Assad in Damascus to discuss aid access and the opening of additional corridors for relief deliveries. The rapid mobilization of transport routes involved numerous countries, with assets visible from Russia, China, and Iran supporting relief efforts aligned with Assad’s network. Notably, a Saudi aircraft touched down in areas under government control for the first time in over a decade, signaling a shift in how regional powers balance their responses to the conflict and its aftermath. Critics warn that aid in kind could become a vehicle for influence, raising concerns about long-term reconstruction and governance in a post-crisis Syria.
Independent voices challenge the notion that Assad’s leadership is unalterable. Critics argue that some relief materials entering Syria may be diverted through informal markets, complicating the aim of rebuilding communities and livelihoods. The debate centers on whether reconstruction will be guided by a broad, civilian-led vision or shaped by the Assad government’s control over key economic levers in Aleppo and beyond. Yet the Assad circle appears to be widening its regional contacts, a development that could alter the balance of power and the prospects for a lasting peace. The Center for Justice and Accountability for Syria notes that public commitments from several governments to support Syrians predated the earthquake, but the catastrophe has accelerated the political calculations surrounding aid, legitimacy, and reconstruction.
Our Arab Partners
During the week, Assad undertook one of his most consequential trips as head of state, traveling to Oman where the ruling sultan received him with formal honors. Although Oman once tightened its diplomatic footprint in the region during earlier protests, it later signaled a willingness to re-engage with Damascus. Jordan and the United Arab Emirates also resumed official contact, marking a renewed wave of regional engagement as Syrian authorities aim to reinsert themselves into the Arab world’s political and economic fabric. The Syrian leader publicly thanked these partners for their support, describing their contributions as strengthening the country’s capacity after the earthquake. Analysts caution that while these gestures improve optics, they do not automatically resolve the deeper challenges of legitimacy, governance, and regional trust built up over years of conflict.
Observers warn that while the initial wave of diplomacy is encouraging, it may take years to overcome the stigma of isolation. Some voices inside the region argue that diplomatic outreach is still limited to a few influential governments, leaving many Syrians to contend with ongoing hardships and uncertainties about future aid, governance, and freedom. Yet as Assad expands his international network, the potential for broader stabilization grows, even as questions about accountability and equitable reconstruction remain central to the conversation. The ongoing dialogue among regional partners signals a shift in how neighbors view Syria and what it means for the broader strategic landscape in the Middle East.