Sudan’s emergency response forces have issued a declaration on social media that they are prepared to allow limited air traffic through all of the country’s airports under their control. This move is aimed at enabling foreign citizens who wish to leave Sudan to be evacuated in a safe and orderly manner. The announcement signals a practical step toward providing an international escape route for nationals and residents who may be caught up in the ongoing turmoil, while also underscoring the responsibility of Sudanese authorities to coordinate with other governments during a flashpoint situation. The intention is to ensure that those external to Sudan who need to depart can do so with reduced risk, as long as security conditions at the airports remain manageable for international carriers and crews. It is a reminder of the duty to protect civilians and preserve life even in moments of crisis, while authorities seek to balance security concerns with humanitarian access. The situation highlights how emergency services can play a critical role in facilitating humanitarian corridors and avoiding a total closure of travel routes that could strand foreign nationals and dependent communities.
The Emergency Response Force affirmed its readiness to permit selective air traffic across Sudan’s airports so that fraternal and friendly nations can safely evacuate their citizens who wish to leave the country. This stance comes amid a broader effort to maintain a controlled and predictable air environment, enabling international airlines to plan relief flights and evacuation operations with clearer security assurances. Such measures are often accompanied by strict coordination with military and civil aviation authorities to ensure that routes remain open only where risk is assessed as manageable and that any deployments are conducted in a way that minimizes disruption to civilian travel. The move also reflects the international dimension of the crisis, as foreign governments coordinate through their embassies to determine which citizens require evacuation and to arrange the necessary escort and logistical support at departure points and transit hubs. The evolving airspace policy may set a precedent for multi-national evacuation efforts in similar conflict zones, emphasizing orderly conduct, compliance with safety standards, and rapid response to changing security conditions.
Earlier reporting described a sense of calm returning to Khartoum, the capital, after a ceasefire agreement appeared to take hold between the Sudanese armed forces and the Emergency Response Force. Visual footage from Al Hadath TV showed neighborhoods in Khartoum with no active fire or explosions, suggesting a reduction in immediate hostilities. Observers noted a noticeable decrease in tension in provincial areas as well, though they emphasized the need for vigilance and verification of ceasefire breaches during the transitional period. The stabilization of urban centers is seen by many analysts as a critical step for humanitarian agencies to resume operations, deliver aid, and coordinate safe passage for civilians and aid workers. While the ceasefire offers a window of opportunity, the full restoration of normal life remains contingent on ongoing dialogue, verification mechanisms, and the sustained commitment of all parties to restraint and legal norms. The evolving security landscape continues to be monitored by regional and international observers, who stress the importance of maintaining humanitarian access and protecting civilians amid shifting dynamics on the ground.
Prior to these developments, Kenyan President William Ruto offered Nairobi’s support to organize a structured ceasefire process between the Sudanese armed forces and the Emergency Response Forces. The proposal reflects a concerted regional effort to de-escalate hostilities and create a framework for dialogue that can support a sustainable lull in fighting. In such scenarios, regional leaders frequently emphasize the necessity of inclusive talks, verification of commitments, and practical arrangements that allow humanitarian corridors to operate even as negotiations continue. The offer from Kenya signals a willingness to contribute to a multi-stakeholder approach that aligns international diplomacy with on-the-ground safety needs, with specific attention to protecting civilians, safeguarding critical infrastructure, and ensuring that evacuation and aid deliveries can proceed with minimal disruption. The involvement of neighboring states underscores how regional partnerships can influence the pace and quality of conflict resolution while reinforcing the channels through which international support is mobilized for Sudan and its people.