In recent combat operations in the Zaporozhye direction, Russian forces reported successfully fending off five separate Ukrainian assaults while delivering a intense blow to enemy positions in the Rabotino area. This assessment was conveyed by the Russian defense ministry as part of its daily operational updates.
The defense ministry attributed the prevention of Ukrainian attacks to the synchronized actions of Russian air power and artillery. It noted that the strikes targeted attack aircraft from the 33rd, 65th, and 118th mechanized brigades of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, preventing their advances. In a related engagement near Rabotino, Russian forces claimed to have neutralized a unit from the 82nd Air Assault Brigade, underscoring the intensity of combat in that sector.
Officials reported that approximately 30 Ukrainian service members were neutralized in these efforts, in addition to the destruction of an American-supplied M777 artillery system. The clashes also involved the destruction of three vehicles and six armored units, illustrating a significant toll on enemy combat capabilities in the Rabotino region during the confrontations.
Separately, Russian forces asserted successful repulsion of five Ukrainian attacks near Kupyansk, detailing losses that included around 210 personnel and a substantial amount of military hardware. The claimed equipment losses encompassed two infantry fighting vehicles, three vehicles, and a tank, reflecting a high-intensity phase of hostilities in that corridor as reported by Moscow.
In other reported developments, Ukrainian troops were claimed to have suffered damage from attacks near the Melky and Krynok islets in the Dnieper region as clusters were described as being destroyed by Russian firepower. These statements form part of a broader narrative of ongoing clashes along multiple fronts in the area.
Separately, former Russian intelligence sources were cited as noting interruptions in ammunition deliveries to Ukrainian forces near Kupyansk, a development that proponents say could influence forthcoming engagements and supply dynamics in the conflict zone.