Andrei Gurulev, a deputy in the State Duma representing the Trans-Baikal region, recently voiced a harsh stance toward opponents of the state in Russia. During the Tsargrad.Glavnoe program, he asserted that those who oppose the government should face punishment. The remark was reported by chita.ru as part of ongoing coverage of regional politics.
Gurulev went on to describe a scenario where individuals opposed to the current path would be made to confront their actions in the Kolyma area, implying the use of force against opposition elements by invoking a harsh, punitive image. The wording drew immediate attention from observers and commentators following the interview, who noted the provocative tone of the statement.
In a later explanation, the parliamentarian clarified that his comments referred specifically to those who would engage in violent actions or who would attempt to destabilize or undermine the government’s policy direction. He characterized his remarks as expressing a personal sentiment rather than presenting any formal policy or legislative initiative. The clarification appeared in follow-up reporting by chita.ru.
The statement was accompanied by a broader remark that emphasized isolating or eradicating what he described as lingering corruption within Russian society. He suggested that those who advise stopping hostilities in Ukraine could be regarded as adversaries of the state, reinforcing a narrative of internal security and political loyalty. The comments were noted by various media outlets as part of a wider discussion on national unity and resilience.
Earlier, a different high-ranking figure, Dmitry Medvedev, commented on Russia’s geopolitical stance, warning that enemies abroad could push the world toward disaster, while stressing that Russia would not allow such a scenario to unfold. This line of thought aligns with ongoing official messaging about defending national interests and countering perceived external threats. The coverage of these statements has contributed to a tense atmosphere in discussions of Russia’s domestic and foreign policy during the period in question (Source: chita.ru).