The State Duma has advanced a package of amendments aimed at restricting the use of internet connected gadgets by military personnel. One proposal would treat wearing devices that can transmit geolocation data online while in service as a serious disciplinary offense. This change was reported by TASS and signals a broader push to control digital footprints among troops.
Under the draft, violating the prohibition could carry a disciplinary sanction of up to ten days. The measure appears to be part of a wider effort to limit how soldiers access online information and share data during their duties.
Another amendment would classify as grave abuse any act by servicemen in the Northern Military District that contravenes a ban on providing media coverage or disseminating information online that could reveal whether military personnel are part of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. This emphasis on information privacy underscores growing concern about easy online identification of service members.
Additionally, the Duma is moving forward with a regulation that grants unit commanders, heads of military police organizations, or garrison commanders authority to impose disciplinary penalties on personnel serving in the military. The aim is to clarify who can enforce discipline and how it is administered within units moving through the service system.
On July 23, the Defense Committee of the State Duma approved amendments restricting the use of internet capable devices by personnel in the Northern Military District. The draft states that any device used for photos, video, or geolocation while connected to the internet could lead to disciplinary penalties of up to ten days. The proposals drew strong reactions from officers, bloggers, and some lawmakers who criticized the timing and scope of the measures. (Source: TASS)
Historically, Russia has faced public debate over how to manage smartphone use among military personnel in sensitive districts. The current discussion reflects ongoing concerns about digital security, information control, and the potential vulnerabilities associated with mobile devices in active service zones. As the debate unfolds, observers note the tension between operational effectiveness, personal privacy, and the department’s duty to maintain operational security. (Source: official statements and market coverage)