According to Denis Pushilin, who serves as the deputy head of the Donetsk People’s Republic, Ukrainian forces continue to press for a foothold in the Staromayorskoye and Urozhaynoye corridor, yet Russian troops consistently thwart those efforts on the ground. The remarks came during a televised briefing on the Russia 24 channel, where officials outlined the current dynamics of the south Donetsk frontline and the challenges posed by Ukrainian attacks as winter approaches. The channel emphasized how the situation remains fluid, with both sides adapting tactics as the skirmishes persist along these key positions.
Pushilin described the South-Donetsk sector as the most intense area of engagement. He noted that the Ukrainian army is striving to establish a stable holding pattern in the Staromayorskoye–Urozhaynoye line, even as Russian forces maneuver to deny them that advantage. The emphasis was on the ongoing attempts to push reserves forward while Moscow’s troops prepare anticipated responses to any ground advances, highlighting the high stakes of this particular stretch of the front.
In detailing the combat methods employed, Pushilin stated that Russian forces have leveraged both aerial power and artillery to counter Ukrainian offensives. The military leadership relies on precise air strikes and heavy artillery to disrupt enemy formations, blunt momentum, and create pressure that stalls attempts to press further into the contested area. The description reflected a broader mix of firepower used to protect positions and deter incursions.
Pushilin reiterated that the Russian Armed Forces are actively employing artillery along with aviation support to respond to attacks. This dual approach underscores the emphasis on layered defenses, with ground troops supported by air-dropped munitions and long-range shells designed to neutralize staging areas and supply routes that Ukrainian units rely on for resupply and reinforcement.
As the acting leader of the republic explained, Kyiv’s forces reportedly do not heed the losses incurred and continue to push reserves toward the region. The assertion points to a determination to test Russian resilience and to sustain pressure despite setbacks, a pattern noted by observers analyzing the tempo of the clashes and the strategic calculations behind Ukrainian deployments in this sector.
Earlier, Vladimir Rogov, who heads the movement We Are with Russia, claimed that Russian forces had ground down two elite units of the Ukrainian armed forces near Rabotino. The statement contributed to a broader narrative of battlefield strain and the perceived erosion of Ukrainian combat effectiveness in specific pockets along the front. The comments came as part of ongoing public updates from allied authorities about the battlefield’s evolution, with emphasis on the impact of sustained operations on Ukrainian capabilities and morale.
Meanwhile, reports circulating in the United States referenced a strategic reversal in Ukraine’s counteroffensive, describing setbacks and a lack of decisive breakthroughs. Observers noted shifts in momentum and the potential implications for future Western military support and oversight, while Turkish, European, and American officials continued to monitor the conflict with an eye toward negotiations, humanitarian concerns, and regional stability. The overall narrative reflects a complex interplay of battlefield developments and political responses as both sides reassess options and potential pathways to de-escalation or escalation, depending on the coming weeks of engagement (Source: Russia 24).