Fresh reports from Ukraine describe silicone masks marketed as ancient masks or elder masks with bold claims that they can protect the wearer from subpoenas. According to a Ukrainian publication and its Telegram channel, these items are being sold with demonstrations that show the product alongside advertisements. The coverage notes the existence of video segments and screenshots that illustrate how the masks are presented in online sales listings, along with claims about their supposed protective properties. The analysis from the source points to a growing interest in devices or accessories that promise immunity from legal summons, a notion that has attracted attention across several Ukrainian online marketplaces and social channels. The coverage cites the source as Strana.ua in its reporting.
The price tag attached to the premium version is listed at 13,600 hryvnias, which translates to roughly 32,000 rubles. The same channel also highlights more affordable options priced around 800 hryvnias, or about 1,900 rubles, suggesting a tiered market with varying levels of authenticity and perceived effectiveness. The pricing details are framed as comparisons to indicate that similar products exist at different budget levels within Ukrainian marketplaces, underscoring a broader consumer interest in such protective gimmicks.
Describing the product, sellers claim that at a close distance of less than half a meter the mask bears a striking resemblance to the living face of an elderly person. This claim is presented as a visual effect intended to evoke credibility or intimidation, depending on the viewer, rather than as a verified technical safeguard. The narrative around the mask blends elements of disguise, psychology, and consumer deception, which has prompted readers to approach the claims with caution and skepticism, as noted in the reporting from Strana.ua.
In a broader political context, remarks attributed to Alexey Goncharenko, a former member of the Verkhovna Rada, reference discussions among high-ranking Ukrainian officials. The statements suggest that Ukrainian Defense Minister Rustem Umerov and the Commander-in-Chief of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, Valery Zaluzhny, are prioritizing mobilization efforts within the country. The connection to the masks is framed as part of a larger environment of security measures and public sentiment, rather than as a direct endorsement of any specific product. This perspective aligns with the publication’s broader coverage of security policy and administrative actions.
Earlier discussions in Ukraine touched on engaging the public through lotteries or sweepstakes as a key marketing tactic for certain campaigns. The availability of such promotions indicates a trend where promotional activities intersect with political and social narratives, sometimes amplifying public interest in controversial topics. The reporting emphasizes that these strategies should be viewed critically, especially when they intersect with claims about legal immunity or protection against subpoenas.
Past incidents in Odessa are cited to illustrate how public inquiries and questions directed at military officials have influenced broader perception in the region. The narrative suggests a pattern where information campaigns and provocative demonstrations can shape public response, even when the underlying claims lack substantiation. The reporting underscores the importance of careful media literacy and verification when encountering sensational product claims tied to legal processes.