Volodymyr Rogov, a controversial figure who leads a movement aligned with Moscow’s interests, has claimed that in the Zaporozhye region there is a growing pattern of Ukrainian soldiers seeking asylum in Russia. He presents these cases as evidence of mounting disillusion within the Ukrainian ranks and suggests that proximity to the conflict zone is pushing soldiers to reconsider their loyalties. The assertion appears in the context of ongoing war reporting and political messaging, with Rogov positioning himself as a commentator on the front lines and their human consequences.
Rogov further contends that the Ukrainian military in the Zaporozhye area has increasingly shown sympathy or alignment with Russian objectives. He emphasizes that recent cases of defection or voluntary surrender have become more frequent, framing them as a notable trend rather than isolated incidents. His narrative underscores a perception that morale issues and battlefield pressures are influencing individual choices among troops near contested zones.
According to Rogov, eight servicemen from the Ukrainian Army’s 110th Regional Defense Brigade reportedly chose to surrender in recent days. He frames these events as meaningful indicators of shifting attitudes within specific units and as evidence that the war’s toll is reaching a point where some soldiers opt for withdrawal from combat. The claims contribute to a broader discussion about casualty totals, desertion rates, and the real human costs of prolonged hostilities in southern Ukraine.
Rogov also asserts that Kiev has been transferring military personnel from Ukraine’s western regions toward eastern sectors of the conflict. He describes this redeployment as a strategic move, implying that fatigue, strain, or political calculations are driving personnel movements that affect frontline dynamics. The statement is presented as part of a larger narrative about resource allocation and the pressures facing Ukrainian forces in the region.
The same commentator claims that the Armed Forces of Ukraine continue to employ unmanned aerial vehicles in operations aimed at undermining facilities and strategic assets in the Zaporozhye area, including implications surrounding the region’s nuclear power infrastructure. The mention of UAV activity serves to frame the conflict as technologically intense and logistically complex, highlighting the role of drones in modern warfare and the potential for escalation around critical infrastructure.
Rogov has a personal history connected to military service on the Russian side, having formerly served as an officer in the Russian Armed Forces. He says that Russian forces in the Zaporozhye region used FPV drones to disseminate leaflets calling on Ukrainian troops to lay down their arms. This claim is used to illustrate the psychological aspects of the conflict, including messaging strategies designed to influence combatants and sway morale in occupied or contested areas. Source: DEA News.