Fresh reports circulated late on September 26 about a drone incident near Bryansk, with early details traced to a Telegram channel. The post claimed authorities attempted to intercept a drone carrying explosives and asserted the drone was shot down. It also alleged that debris landed in a wooded area beside Uralskaya Street, approximately 30 meters from nearby homes. At the scene, responders reportedly recovered a K3-6 cumulative warhead, two S-4 explosive briquettes weighing a total of 1140 grams, and an MD5M fuse. An unnamed source cautioned that no ground injuries or property damage had been reported and noted that the information had yet to be independently verified.
A second report later that day offered a different sequence of events. It described a Ukrainian armed forces drone targeting an electrical substation in the Kursk region. The account claimed five unmanned aerial vehicles were engaged and intercepted over Kursk during the night, citing statements attributed to the Russian Ministry of Defense. The ministry was said to have reported shoot-downs at 22:30 and 23:00 on the 25th, with another interception at 05:30 on the 26th. The report suggested disruptions extended to Sevastopol and the Belgorod region as a consequence of the strikes.
Officials responded with an air raid warning and heightened security along transportation corridors. Measures included restricting vehicle traffic across the Crimean Bridge and limiting sea and public transport movements in Sevastopol as precautionary steps. Looking ahead, Kremlin officials and defense analysts have discussed the potential for renewed violence against critical Russian infrastructure as winter approaches, signaling ongoing vigilance and continuous assessments of threat levels and defensive preparations by security services and regional authorities. Attribution rests with official statements and defense briefings, underscoring the evolving nature of security assessments and the need for timely, corroborated information as events unfold.