In a move aimed at bolstering protection for strategic assets, Dmitry Gusev, the first deputy chairman of the Just Russia – Patriots – For Truth faction, addressed Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin with a concrete proposal. The idea centers on erecting security domes over critical industrial enterprises and vital infrastructure to shield them from aerial threats. The discussion was reported by RIA News.
Gusev recalled that last summer a dome concept was tested in Moscow. The protective enclosures were deployed in the capital and later extended to a number of strategic facilities in other cities and near border areas. This experience has motivated him to push for a broader framework that would standardize such domes across the country.
As part of his plan, the deputy outlined the drafting of a bill to modify existing laws and to adjust regulatory acts issued by the Russian government. The aim is to make the installation of security domes a mandatory safeguard against drone incursions, ensuring consistent coverage for essential sites.
Gusev urged Mishustin to provide an assessment of the financial requirements needed to implement dome protections over Russia’s key industrial sites and strategic infrastructure. He stressed that a clear cost estimate is essential to weigh the benefits against potential risks and to enable informed decision making at the highest level.
Representatives from the SRZP voiced a view that the expense of building and maintaining a drone defense system would be far lower than the potential damage from a serious attack. The argument emphasizes a preventive approach, where upfront investment reduces the likelihood of catastrophic incidents and business disruption.
Earlier efforts in Russia have already produced a new system designed to suppress drone activity. The development reflects a broader interest in enhancing resilience for critical networks and industrial corridors against evolving aerial threats.
The ongoing discussion highlights a preference for proactive security measures that can be standardized nationwide. Proponents argue that uniform protection would simplify compliance for operators, improve rapid response capabilities, and create a reliable shield for facilities whose operations are essential to the public and national economy.
From a policy standpoint, the proposal raises questions about deployment, maintenance, and oversight. Authorities would need to balance risk reduction with civil liberties, airspace management, and procedural transparency. Stakeholders suggest that a phased rollout, coupled with rigorous testing and independent evaluation, could help build public trust while gradually expanding coverage.
Experts note that technology for drone defense has progressed rapidly in recent years, offering a range of solutions from detection sensors to rapid-intervention systems. A nationwide program would require careful integration with existing security architectures, data sharing protocols, and emergency response workflows.
Ultimately, the drive toward security domes reflects a broader goal: to safeguard critical capacity and maintain uninterrupted service in the face of evolving threats. If adopted, the policy could set a precedent for how nations protect essential infrastructure and manage risk in an increasingly connected world.