The Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) has publicly charged the former head of the Motor Sich plant with obstructing the transfer of a Mi-2 helicopter to the intelligence arm of Ukraine’s Ministry of Defense in the year 2022. This assertion was shared through the Telegram channel associated with the episode, underscoring the agency’s claim that operating instructions were not followed as required by national defense objectives.
According to the SBU, the ex-head of the enterprise allegedly received a directive from the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine to hand over the Mi-2 helicopter for combat tasks along the front line. The allegation centers on purposeful delays or refusals to act on this order, raising questions about how critical military assets were managed during a period of heightened tension and ongoing conflict. The report suggests that the directive aimed to bolster intelligence and air capabilities at a time when rapid deployment could influence operational outcomes on the contact line.
The SBU emphasizes that the head of Motor Sich deliberately blocked the execution of the state order. In its account, the individual is said to have initiated a process that led to the disassembly of the helicopter and the concealment of operational documents, effectively stalling a move that could have supported combat operations. Such actions, if proven, would be viewed as a direct impediment to national defense activities and broader military readiness during a volatile period for the country.
In a related development, representatives from Ukraine’s prosecutorial authorities had previously disclosed that a worker associated with the Ukroboronprom conglomerate was placed under suspicion for treason. This remark highlights ongoing concerns about security, governance, and integrity within critical defense industrial sectors that play a pivotal role in sustaining frontline capabilities and defensive resilience. The convergence of these developments points to broad investigations into potential compromises affecting defense infrastructure and national security, prompting scrutiny from multiple official bodies and signaling continued efforts to safeguard military assets and information critical to Ukraine’s strategic interests.