In Saratov, a court decision addressed an incident at Byki LLC, the bar owned by the company, where a uniformed soldier was refused entry and the establishment was fined. This event was reported by the press office of the regional State Labor Inspectorate.
The episode occurred on the evening of November 26 at Harat’s bar. A 43-year-old soldier, who was on leave, planned to meet a friend inside the venue. He was denied entry after the bartender explained the policy: military or sports uniforms were not allowed inside, and only a police officer on duty could enter in uniform. The rule appeared clear, and the soldier left disappointed, unable to join his friend for the evening.
Following the incident, media coverage drew attention to the bar’s practices, prompting the local prosecutor’s office to order an unplanned inspection of the establishment. During the inspection, the labor inspectorate noted that the organization resisted providing certain documents requested by the authorities, raising questions about compliance with state oversight procedures. The court subsequently ruled that the bar had obstructed the work of a state control body official and imposed a financial penalty on the business. A similar sanction was issued against an officer associated with Byki LLC.
Earlier information indicated that the same soldier had been in Novosibirsk, and there were accusations of the mobilized individual being denied access to the club on other occasions, with rumors of confrontations and violence around him. These details contributed to the broader public discussion about uniform policies in civilian venues and the balance between security measures and individual rights, especially for individuals in uniform or on duty. [State Labor Inspectorate]
The case highlights how private establishments must navigate regulations that govern access and compliance with oversight bodies, while also reflecting society’s ongoing debate about security, uniformed personnel, and public spaces. The outcome shows that authorities are prepared to intervene when access policies interfere with lawful inspections or the duties of state control agencies. The incident serves as a reminder to service members and the general public about the boundaries of entry rules and the importance of cooperation with regulatory checks to maintain safe and orderly environments for all patrons. [State Labor Inspectorate attribution]