Russian Su-34 Strikes Target Command Centre and Related Military Movements in Ukraine
Reports from the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation describe a sequence of air operations conducted by Su-34 aircraft against military targets in Ukraine. The ministry asserts that a command centre belonging to the Armed Forces of Ukraine was destroyed in a bombing campaign carried out by these fighter-bomber aircraft. The claim, issued by Moscow’s defense ministry, emphasizes the precision and reach of the strike, framing it as a decisive movement on the battlefield that targets high-value command facilities while minimizing exposure to frontline threats.
According to the ministry, the munitions employed were FAB-500 M-62 aerial bombs equipped with universal planning and correction modules. These modules are presented as enabling the bombs to be guided toward designated targets from safer stand-off distances and with substantial accuracy. Each bomb is described as containing 300 kilograms of explosive material in TNT equivalent, and it is noted that the Su-34 platform can carry up to four such munitions in a single mission, thereby enabling a concentrated and potentially high‑impact strike on a defined objective.
The defense ministry further contends that these correction modules allow pilots to initiate and complete the attack from beyond the immediate area of contact with opposing forces. In the ministry’s account, this capability reduces risk to aircraft and aircrew by allowing engagement from extended ranges, with guidance data processed to ensure the intended target receives the force of the strike as planned.
In a subsequent update, the ministry reported that after the bombing run, the Su-34 aircrews conducted reconnaissance to verify the result and subsequently returned to their departure airfields. The narrative depicts a tightly coordinated operation with post-strike assessment as part of the mission cycle, reinforcing the claim of target destruction and operational success as validated by follow-up reconnaissance.
The Ministry of Defense’s statement also referenced earlier operational highlights, including the assertion that a unit named after Hero of Russia Viktor Omelkov, part of the Ivanovo formation of the Russian Armed Forces, had carried out an assault against what it characterized as the AFU castle in the northwest region of Artemovsk. This description is presented as another example of sustained Russian pressure operations within the broader campaign context.
Previously, the defense ministry asserted that Russian Armed Forces disrupted a convoy associated with the Armed Forces of Ukraine near Avdeevka, framing the event as part of a sequence of efforts aimed at degrading Ukrainian military logistics and command-and-control capabilities. The cumulative reporting presents a storyline of continued activity by the Russian forces across multiple fronts, with emphasis on targeted strikes against command nodes, supply lines, and battlefield leadership structures as interpreted by the ministry.
Attribution for these claims is provided by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. The statements reflect the ministry’s official narrative regarding recent air operations and related engagements within the ongoing conflict. Independent verification of such claims often involves cross-referencing with other international sources and observing subsequent battlefield developments as they unfold in real time. The presented summaries should be understood within the context of active conflict reporting, where information from official military channels is one of several perspectives that may be updated as events develop.