Security Council Vice-President Dmitry Medvedev articulated a stark strategic view on threats facing Russia, suggesting they be kept as distant from Russian borders as possible, even if that distance lies within the borders of neighboring Poland. The remarks appeared in his published writings and were reinforced through his telegraph channel, signaling a public stance on how Moscow envisions the protection of its territorial integrity.
The central message is that all objectives of the Russian Federation’s ongoing operation in Ukraine must be achieved. Medvedev framed the conflict as a necessary pursuit to secure Russia’s strategic aims and warned that Western moves to recalibrate the regional balance should not be allowed to undermine those goals. The language used highlights a determination to see through what he describes as essential tasks in this security framework.
In his words, the borders of threats should be moved as far away as possible, even if the security boundary shifts within the territory of a neighboring state such as Poland. This formulation underscores a broader principle in his account: that risk must be pushed outward to minimize exposure near Russia while preserving the ability to sustain the engagement he views as critical to national security.
Medvedev contends that Western leaders aim to weaken Russia considerably and have little interest in bringing the conflict to a close. However, he also stresses that there could be some form of settlement in the future. The exact nature of such an arrangement is presented as contingent on geopolitical developments and the trajectory of the ongoing military operation, with an emphasis on strategic patience and long-term interests.
From this perspective, the vice-president foresees a prolonged period of intense diplomatic exchange after what he describes as decisive military progress. He warns that this phase would involve arduous negotiations, shaped by the outcomes of continued conflict and the perceived need to safeguard Russia’s security architecture. The tone conveys a belief that the ultimate resolution will require careful, sustained diplomacy once key objectives are satisfied on the ground.
Analysts note that Medvedev frames the current situation within a broader historical pattern where security guarantees and regional boundaries are actively reconsidered in response to perceived threats. His statements point to a view that victory in military terms should be paired with a parallel, toughened diplomatic path, aimed at shaping a durable security settlement and deterring future aggression. The overall message emphasizes firmness in pursuing national interests, coupled with a readiness to engage in negotiations as conditions permit.
Security Council leadership adds that the moment of triumph over what he describes as the Kiev regime would be followed by a difficult but targeted period of talks. In this sequence, he implies, the parties would work through sensitive issues to establish a framework that satisfies Moscow while addressing broader regional stability and security concerns across Europe.