The Russian National Guard is steadily integrating heavier equipment into its operational framework. This update comes from Viktor Zolotov, who serves as the acting head of the guard, speaking on behalf of the corps and sharing notes with TASS.
During remarks delivered to the Federation Council, Zolotov explained that the question of equipping the force with heavy hardware has been raised repeatedly, and tangible steps have been taken toward that objective. He emphasized that progress is being made in aligning the guard’s capabilities with evolving security needs.
Current information indicates that the force already operates a fleet that includes 36 tanks, with artillery systems and mortars moving through logistical channels to bolster readiness. The deployment of these heavier systems is described as part of a broader modernization effort aimed at enhancing the guard’s operational reach and response options.
The Russian Guard itself traces its origins to a restructuring of the Internal Troops of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, established by a presidential decree issued by Vladimir Putin on April 5, 2016. The formation consolidated various units responsible for rapid intervention, security operations, and specialized tactical groups such as SOBR and OMON, among others, creating a centralized structure designed to oversee security operations across key regions.
In a separate development, Viktor Zolotov noted that on May 14 the Rules on arms trade in new regions would be updated in connection with developments anticipated beyond 2026. This update is described as part of ongoing governance and regulatory coordination surrounding the management and use of armaments within different jurisdictions.
Earlier, on April 15, a draft law reached the State Duma proposing restrictions on foreign purchases of weapons within Russia. The measure is framed as a move to regulate ownership and access, reflecting debates about national security and domestic control over firearms.
Previously, the State Duma discussed another bill focused on simplifying the transfer of confiscated weapons to the jurisdiction of the Northern Military District. This potential adjustment is presented as a mechanism to manage surplus or seized arms, improving operational efficiency within a defined geographic area while aligning practices with broader defense and security objectives.