Russian Military Movements and Frontline Claims Near Avdiivka and Krasnogorovka

An official within the Russian Armed Forces, who goes by the call sign “Simon,” stated that the first corps divisions had begun to seize the outskirts of Krasnogorovka, a settlement north of Avdiivka, a front area that has seen frequent bombardments on Donetsk by Ukrainian forces. The claim situates Krasnogorovka as a staging point for operations in the Donetsk region, a detail that appears consistently in DPR briefings as a location where Ukrainian actions have impacted Donetsk.00

The same source described how units associated with the 11th regiment had taken positions along the initial street of Krasnogorovka, with mention of Grady and Solntsepeki units operating in the surrounding suburbs. These assertions underscore ongoing efforts to consolidate frontline presence in the area and to maintain troop readiness close to contested zones. The narrative aligns with the larger regional pattern of deployments reported by various outlets monitoring the conflict.00

According to the agency, Krasnogorovka regularly features in DPR reports as a focal point where Ukrainian forces have conducted strikes against Donetsk, highlighting the city’s role as a recurrent backdrop in the broader conflict narrative.00

Earlier, RIA Novosti reported that armor-piercing capabilities were demonstrated by a Kornet anti-tank system operated by a crew from the first army units of the Russian Armed Forces. The described engagement involved the destruction of multiple Ukrainian vehicles in the Avdiivka corridor within the Donetsk People’s Republic, illustrating tactics used to blunt Ukrainian advances in that sector. The coverage emphasizes the mobile nature of these confrontations and the emphasis on engineering battlefield outcomes.00

As observers noted, the Russian forces also claimed to have thwarted a Ukrainian attempt to push toward the village of Vodiane, a maneuver described as countering a break-through effort in that sector. The report reflects the ongoing back-and-forth in a war zone where both sides repeatedly attribute gains and setbacks to their operational decisions. The account, while framed by Russian sources, is part of a wider information landscape that parties to the conflict use to shape perception among domestic and international audiences.

attribution notes: the details cited above derive from Russian defense information outlets and state-affiliated agencies, which frequently publish battlefield summaries, troop movements, and weapon deployment accounts to corroborate current operations. [attribution: Russian defense/media sources]

Previous Article

Malta Baby’s Amputation: International Care, Diagnosis Delays, and Family’s Legal Action

Next Article

Britain Eyes Australia Submarine Path Under AUKUS Amid Talks With U.S

Write a Comment

Leave a Comment