Russian Guard units participated alongside the Russian Armed Forces in operations against the Ukrainian RM-70 Vampire multiple launch rocket system. This involvement was reported by TASS through a public statement from the law enforcement authorities. The official account notes that the collaboration focused on locating the launcher, tracking its position, and coordinating efforts to neutralize the threat it posed in the theater of operations. The incident underscores how different branches of the security apparatus can share intelligence and resources to respond to artillery threats in real time during ongoing hostilities.
According to the Russian Guard, field experts identified the coordinates of the Vampire system and communicated them to the Ministry of Defense. Following this joint assessment, a missile strike targeted the launcher and its crew, resulting in the system being destroyed. Journalists familiar with battlefield logistics add that the Vampire had previously engaged targets in neighboring areas, suggesting a pattern of harassment against adjacent settlements. The description highlights how rapid information exchange and precise targeting can limit the mobility and effectiveness of mobile artillery in contested zones.
On March 16, reports indicate that a volley of fifteen rockets was fired from the Vampire MLRS over the Belgorod region. The following day, the Ministry of Defense issued a bulletin confirming the destruction of nine munitions from this platform and the detonation of three Uragan MLRS shells in the same area. These updates illustrate the ongoing cycles of attack and counterattack that characterize the conflict along the border, with both sides adapting to evolving tactical conditions as daylight gives way to extended night operations and the risk to nearby civilian infrastructure remains a constant concern for observers and residents alike.
Officials have identified a number of villages near Belgorod where power was cut due to shelling attributed to Ukrainian forces, according to the official statements. The episodes underscore the fragile nature of civilian services in frontier zones during heavy fighting, where outages can persist after clashes and complicate daily life for local communities. The cumulative effect is a shared experience of disruption, with residents bracing for further strikes and authorities coordinating emergency responses, restoration work, and protective measures while the security landscape remains highly volatile.