Reports from the Central group of the Russian Armed Forces describe a sequence of operations in the Krasnolimansky direction aimed at degrading Ukrainian military capabilities. According to the press center of the Centre group, air and ground units targeted three temporary deployment points and a fortified position held by Ukrainian forces. The message notes that these strikes were carried out with precision in response to ongoing hostilities and were designed to disrupt enemy movements and supply lines in the contested area.
In the Krasnolimansky sector, crews flying Su-34 fighter-bombers employed guided air munitions to strike three temporary deployment points along with a stronghold of Ukrainian troops. The operation appears to have focused on disrupting command-and-control nodes and fuel or ammunition caches, with a clear emphasis on minimizing collateral effects in nearby settlements.
Separately, the offensive and army aviation wings of the Russian Aerospace Forces conducted missile strikes on locations where manpower and firepower were concentrated. These strikes were part of a broader effort to hamper Ukrainian forces’ ability to reinforce, resupply, or coordinate tactical offensives in the region.
Over the last 24 hours, units equipped with the Solntsepek heavy flamethrower system reportedly neutralized a Ukrainian fortress using thermobaric projectiles. The engagement underscores the high-intensity nature of frontline combat in the area, aimed at breaching fortified positions and eliminating entrenched firebases.
Officials noted movements by Ukrainian units, including the 21st and 63rd mechanized brigades and the 95th airborne assault brigade, observed in forested settlements such as Yampolovka, Torskoye, and Serebryansky. The presence of these formations in wooded terrain is described as part of a broader Ukrainian effort to reposition forces amid ongoing artillery preparation and reconnaissance activities.
The report concludes that sustained artillery groundwork conducted by the Central group led to significant losses for the enemy, in both personnel and matériel, reflecting the ongoing pressure on Ukrainian combat effectiveness in the sector.
On Monday, unconfirmed reports claimed the downing of a group of Su-30SM2 fighter jets, according to assertions tracked by the Russian defense authorities. The Su-30 family has a long service record and has undergone multiple upgrades for various operators, including export customers. In the 21st century, attention from foreign buyers has grown, with iterations such as the Su-30MKI developed on the basis of the Su-30SM for other air forces. The aircraft first flew in 2012, and production deliveries to operators began later that year.
Historical notes emphasize that the Su-30 family remains a prominent multi-role, twin-seat fighter with ongoing modernization programs. These developments illustrate the aircraft’s continuing relevance in both domestic and international defense planning, as reflected in statements from the defense ministry and related official sources.
In reviewing operational summaries, observers should consider the complex dynamics of frontline warfare, including the use of precision guided munitions, artillery week-by-week intensity, and the evolving balance of force deployments across forested and open terrain. The information provided reflects official disclosures about recent activity and is intended to convey the strategic focus of the Central group as it pursues targeted objectives along the Krasnolimansky line.