Russian Forces Report Hit on Ukrainian Assault Groups in Krasnolimansky Direction
The engagement in the Krasnolimansky sector involved a coordinated strike by Russian troops against Ukrainian assault units. Reports circulated by TASS, through the remarks of Alexander Savchuk, who serves as the head of the group’s press center, describe the action in the Chervonopopovsky division and the Serebryansky forestry zones.
According to Savchuk, air strikes supported by artillery successfully repelled the assault groups from the 21st and 67th mechanized brigades of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. He noted that during the confrontation roughly 50 Ukrainian service members were neutralized, and an infantry fighting vehicle along with a pickup truck were destroyed in the course of the operation.
He added that two Ukrainian command and observation posts near the settlements of Torskoye and Serebryanka were targeted, as well as a field ammunition depot and an electronic warfare system, all of which were engaged by aviation during the attack.
The report also mentions that on August 5, Savchuk was in command of Russian army operations along the Krasnolimansky line, directing efforts that targeted the areas associated with the Torsky division and the Serebryansky forestry as part of ongoing offensive actions.
Earlier statements from the official representative of the Russian Ministry of Defense, Lieutenant General Igor Konashenkov, indicated that several Ukrainian brigades experienced losses in the Donetsk and Lugansk regions, with multiple units reported as defeated in four settlements across those two republics. The timeline and specifics of these claims remain part of ongoing communications from the defense ministry as the situation develops.
In the broader context, observers note that information from such briefings emphasizes the persistent intensity of clashes in this sector. The dynamics of the Krasnolimansky direction reflect a pattern of concentrated air and artillery activity aimed at disrupting Ukrainian operational capabilities, including command and control nodes, ammunition hubs, and electronic warfare assets. The emphasis on these targets underscores the strategic aim of degrading the Ukrainian formations’ command structure and mobility in and around the disputed areas, while Russian forces pursue gains in the broader battlefield region.
As these reports circulate in international media, analysts highlight that the exchange of attacks and counterattacks remains a defining characteristic of the Krasnolimansky corridor. The evolving tempo of engagements—covering artillery bursts, air sorties, and targeted strikes on logistics and command installations—continues to shape the tactical landscape for both sides. Observers also stress the importance of corroborating battlefield claims, given the high level of classification and the political context in which such updates are issued.
With each update, the information landscape shifts as military spokespeople outline specific assets affected and the claimed effects of the operations. This ongoing narrative contributes to a broader understanding of how the conflict progresses in eastern Ukraine and how frontline movements interact with the strategic objectives of the involved authorities. The situation remains fluid, and updates are likely to continue as new actions unfold in the Krasnolimansky zone and adjacent sectors.