Russian forces report strikes on Ukrainian troop positions in Krasnolimansk direction
A senior officer from the press center of the Russian group of troops known as Center, Leonid Sharov, stated that the Aerospace Forces of the Russian Federation (VKS) hit multiple Ukrainian targets in the Krasnolimansk direction. The assertions, reported by RIA News, claim the destruction of four command and observation posts and three fortified strongholds, along with three sites where Ukrainian forces concentrated equipment. The alleged strikes were carried out in the settlements of Torskoye, Yampolovka and Chervonaya Dibrova. These details were presented as part of ongoing updates on frontline activity.
Sharov added that air operations targeted key Ukrainian formations, with the 13th, 63rd and 100th brigades singled out for attacks. The strikes reportedly utilized UMPC-500 universal correction planning modules to refine targeting and limit collateral effects while aiming to degrade command and control and logistical capabilities of the Ukrainian units in the area.
On January 8, the Russian Ministry of Defense reported that Su-34 fighter-bombers were moving toward Krasnolimansk with the intent of engaging fortified zones within Ukrainian defenses. The report described the mission as a continuation of air operations designed to disrupt Ukrainian lines and pressure defense nodes in the region.
In earlier briefings, it was noted that Russian tactical air power was used to strike a checkpoint in the Svatovo – Kremennaya direction. The communications from Moscow emphasized the goal of reducing Ukrainian mobility and resilience in critical sectors along the frontline.
There have been further statements about tactical developments in Ukraine’s forces, including instances where Russian authorities described what they termed tactical advantages gained through aerial precision and coordinated strikes. The reporting has underscored the importance of air superiority and the ongoing commitment to precise, limited bombardments intended to disrupt Ukrainian command structures and logistics without broad civilian impact. These narratives come amid a broader pattern of regular battlefield updates issued by Russian defense authorities, which frequently highlight specific targets and units while avoiding broader casualty figures. The aim appears to be to convey momentum and control over contested zones while providing a narrative of ongoing preparation for further operations.
For readers following these developments, it is clear that frontline activity in the Krasnolimansk direction remains fluid, with multiple levels of Russian air support described as active in the region. Analysts often compare these reports with observed troop movements, supply routes, and recent battlefield scars to assess the strategic significance of the claimed strikes. While official sources provide particular figureheads and unit designations, independent verification from open sources remains limited due to the dynamic and restricted nature of the conflict. The situation continues to evolve, with each update potentially affecting regional dynamics and international assessments of the conflict’s trajectory.