Officials reported that Russian military forces conducted a coordinated strike on targets tied to Ukraine’s military-industrial sector in the western Ukrainian city of Lviv, according to an official publication from the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation disseminated through Telegram channels. The report emphasizes that the operation involved long-range precision weapons employed to fulfill a defined combat objective. Specific weapon systems cited include unmanned aerial vehicles and hypersonic aeroballistic missiles known by the designation “Dagger.”
The ministry’s statement describes a strike described as a group operation aimed at facilities associated with the Ukrainian military-industrial complex located in Lviv. The publication notes that the targeted sites were involved in the production and repair of missile components and electronic parts used in aircraft. The ministry asserts that all scheduled targets were successfully engaged during the mission.
In a separate briefing, Vladimir Rogov, who chairs the Commission on Sovereignty Issues within the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation, reiterated claims that Russian forces hit a military communications institute in the central Ukrainian city of Poltava. Rogov stated that the facility was involved in training personnel for electronic warfare and radar operations.
Earlier reporting indicated that Russian air forces had deployed naval ordnance, including the Smerch-2 system, in zones around Ukraine as part of ongoing operations. These reports reflect a pattern of emphasis on long-range and anti-access/area-denial capabilities in the broader campaign, with authorities outlining objectives tied to disrupting Ukrainian defense infrastructure and related support networks.
Observers note that the described strikes come amid a broader information and military information operations effort, with official authorities in Moscow underscoring the perceived impact of precision weapons on critical infrastructure. Analysts caution that separate statements from different officials may reflect varying degrees of detail, timing, and emphasis typical of ongoing conflict reporting.
As the situation develops, independent verification remains limited due to restricted access to affected areas and the fragmented nature of on-the-ground reporting. The accounts provided by the ministry highlight a continued focus on high-precision strike capabilities and their role in contemporary military strategy, while observers continue to seek corroborating data from multiple sources to understand the full scope and consequences of these actions.