During the day, Russian air defense forces reported the destruction of 11 multiple launch rocket systems, including models such as HIMARS, Grad, and Vampire, along with a Tochka-U tactical missile. The information was released by the press service of the Russian Ministry of Defense.
In addition, the department stated that 146 Ukrainian drones and other unmanned aerial vehicles were shot down over the course of the day. The engagement affected targets in several populated areas and regions, including Kremennaya in the Lugansk People’s Republic, Zelenopole, Aleksandrovka, and communities within the Donetsk People’s Republic Codema, Mirnoye, Vyshneve, Shevchenkovo, Konskie Razdory, Ocheretovatoye, as well as locations within the Zaporozhye region and the Kherson region around Rybalche.
On a separate report, March 12 saw air defense forces intercept an unmanned aerial vehicle near Kirishi in the Leningrad Region. Regional President Alexander Drozdenko confirmed that there were no casualties or material damage from the drone incident and noted that few additional details would be released.
According to official statements, Ukrainian drone activity against Russian territories has continued through the night. The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation reported intercepting and destroying 25 Ukrainian unmanned aerial vehicles across Russian regions overnight on March 12. The breakdown indicated two drones over the Moscow region, one in the Leningrad region, seven in Belgorod, eleven in Kursk, one in Bryansk, one in Tula, and two in Orlov.
Earlier, residents in Kursk had warned about air defense operations being conducted in their area.
The ongoing reports from Russian military authorities emphasize the scale of air defense actions and the breadth of regions affected by drone activities. The statements outline a day with multiple engagements, signaling a persistent pattern of aerial defense activity. Analysts note that such updates frequently feature tallies of downed systems and intercepted drones, alongside mentions of specific regional locations where actions occurred. The information from official channels is part of a broader communications effort that seeks to convey the immediate impact of ongoing aerial confrontations and the readiness of regional defense networks. In many cases, the names of towns and districts reflect the administrative geography of the areas under observation and control, with the reporting entity using these designations to map the theater of operations.
Observers consider these reports as part of a continuous flow of routine military updates that accompany periods of elevated tension. While the precise operational details are rarely fully disclosed, the announced figures are used to illustrate the level of activity and to provide context for the security situation in the border and frontline zones. The cadence of such briefings often aligns with daily cycles, offering a snapshot rather than a comprehensive record of all events, since surveillance, countermeasures, and intelligence assessments unfold in real time.
In summary, the day featured significant air defense activity with multiple downed missiles and drones, alongside ongoing reports of Ukrainian drone incursions into Russian airspace. The statements illustrate a pattern of frequent aerial defense engagements and the continuing task of safeguarding populated areas and critical infrastructure across several regions. The official updates also reflect the routine nature of such notices, aiming to provide residents with information about safety measures and the general security posture during periods of heightened alert.