Russia is considering new restrictions on illegal migration as part of a broader policy package aimed at strengthening national security, public health, and social cohesion. A public expert report called Russia’s Migration Policy and National Development Goals, produced by the Presidential Council for the Promotion of Civil Society and Human Rights, outlines a range of options for tightening controls and improving how migrant workers are managed. The document, prepared for lawmakers and government agencies, treats migration policy as a central factor in the country’s long term development. It acknowledges that migration brings both benefits and pressures to local labor markets, health systems, and communities, and it calls for measures that balance economic needs with safeguards for citizens and the social fabric. The report emphasizes clear responsibility for migrant workers within the administration, along with predictable rules that apply across regions and sectors. It also describes how migration policy interacts with employment standards, language and education initiatives, health care access, and law enforcement cooperation. The aim is to shape a policy environment that reduces irregular entry, raises compliance with labor norms, and protects public health and safety while respecting human rights. The plan suggests that new restrictions could be implemented gradually, with pilot programs in select areas before a nationwide rollout. Transparency, data sharing among agencies, and independent oversight are highlighted as crucial elements to avoid gaps that could weaken both worker protection and national interests.
Valery Fadeev, who heads the Human Rights Council, proposed establishing a standard of state health insurance for migrant workers. In discussions and in public broadcasts, Fadeev argued that employers who recruit migrant labor should bear responsibility for ensuring that workers are covered by voluntary health insurance. This shift would place the obligation on hiring entities to secure access to medical services for their staff, rather than relying on sporadic coverage or on state provision only. Proponents say this approach would help migrants receive timely medical care, reduce unpaid medical costs, and create clearer accountability for employers. Critics warn about potential loopholes and the need for safeguards to protect workers from discrimination or sudden loss of coverage during disputes over contracts. The discussion underscores a broader policy objective: align health protection with labor recruitment while maintaining fairness and social protection for newcomers who contribute to the economy. Implementing this approach would require coordination among health authorities, employers, and immigration services to verify contracts, monitor compliance, and address gaps in care as workers move between regions.
Beyond insurance, the Human Rights Council recommends a package of medical measures for migrants entering or living in the country. The council proposes mandatory medical examinations for new arrivals and periodic health checks for those already employed. Vaccination status would be reviewed in line with national public health standards, and routine drug testing could be introduced for workers in certain sectors or programs. The goal is to detect health risks early, protect workers and the public, and maintain a safe labor market without compromising privacy. The plan would require procedures to protect patient confidentiality and to ensure that findings are handled within legal bounds. Health facilities would need clear reporting channels for positive results to the appropriate authorities, with rights and due process protected to prevent misuse. The policy envisions a system where health data supports public health goals while avoiding the stigmatization of migrants. It would require a coordinated effort among medical providers, employers, and immigration authorities to schedule testing, store records securely, and share information where legally permitted.
Under these recommendations, any migrant found with illegal substances would trigger formal action, with health officials reporting findings to law enforcement.
Separately, officials in the Ministry of Internal Affairs announced figures on foreigners who did not pass the Russian language exam. The disclosure followed ongoing efforts to quantify language proficiency among migrants and to assess integration needs. In the same period, members of the State Duma outlined new measures aimed at tightening control over immigrant movements. These steps reflect a continuing emphasis on verification, documentation, and oversight as part of Russia’s migration policy. Supporters say stricter controls help protect communities and secure labor markets, while critics argue that language training and inclusive programs should be available to promote legal staying and productive participation in the economy. The evolving policy landscape shows a move toward clearer rules, consistent enforcement, and safer communities.