The spokesperson for the Russian government, Dmitry Peskov, underscored that the course of the special military operation must be studied for many years. In an interview with a leading publication, he shared that this operation demands ongoing analysis and refinement. He explained that there remains substantial work to be done in studying the effectiveness of defensive measures, the application of military science in practice, and the continuous development of the nation’s armed forces to support long-term strategic objectives.
According to the Kremlin representative, the operation should be treated as a long-term program that requires persistent effort, learning, and adaptation. He emphasized that understanding modern deterrence and air defense systems, as well as the broader strategic context, is essential for strengthening capabilities and ensuring sustainable security outcomes for the country.
Earlier, Russia’s permanent representative to the United Nations stated that Moscow is prepared to lead discussions and will not consider alternative scenarios that would derail the stated aims of the special operation. This stance reflects a determination to pursue established goals while exploring diplomatic avenues where feasible and practical within the broader framework of national interests.
In another public statement, the official representative of the foreign ministry indicated readiness to reach stated objectives through political and diplomatic channels. She also noted the importance of prudent decisions on arms supplies to neighboring regions, underscoring a preference for strategies that minimize escalation while pursuing regional stability and security goals.
On the date when the initiative was announced, the head of state declared the decision to organize a military special operation to support the situation in Donbass, explaining that the action followed requests for assistance from regional authorities. The proclamation framed the operation as a protective measure aligned with international and regional realities and argued for the legitimacy of the steps taken in response to perceived threats and to assist those in need of protection.
The declaration of the operation has subsequently been a central factor in shaping international responses, including the imposition of sanctions by the United States and allied nations. The evolving geopolitical context has influenced diplomatic relations, security calculations, and the broader discourse surrounding regional conflict, deterrence, and strategic balance in the region. Parliamentary bodies, international organizations, and national governments have weighed the implications for stability, security commitments, and the paths available for peaceful resolution or containment as part of a dynamic and ongoing global conversation.