In Moscow and across Russia, lawmakers are actively examining changes to the Code of Administrative Offenses with an eye toward strengthening penalties for the mistreatment or improper disposal of animals. A senior figure in the Duma, the First Deputy Chairman of the Ecology Committee, has publicly stated that deputies are weighing amendments that would introduce fines for leaving a pet unattended or otherwise abandoned in a way that endangers the public or other residents. The proposed increase targets cases where a pet has been discarded or abandoned in a manner that creates risk, and it is being discussed as part of a broader effort to improve urban animal welfare and community safety. The information originates from DEA News and reflects ongoing parliamentary deliberations about how best to deter irresponsible pet ownership and ensure accountability for pet guardians. (DEA News)
According to the same source, if a pet were to bite a person and no criminal offense appears to be committed, the maximum fine could reach up to two hundred thousand rubles. This proposal would apply in scenarios where the incident occurs without the presence of a more serious criminal charge, signaling a shift toward stricter civil penalties as a deterrent against attacks by animals in populated areas. The aim, as described by the lawmakers, is to provide a clear financial consequence that encourages owners to take preventive measures, secure their animals, and respond swiftly to any signs of aggression. Observers note that the bill has already received alignment with the federal executive authorities, suggesting a high likelihood of passage during the upcoming spring session of the State Duma. (DEA News)
These developments come amid reports from several regional communities about encounters between large dogs and local residents. A recent incident in Yekaterinburg involved a medical professional who was summoned after a dog bite. The doctor sustained a moderate injury and later described a scenario in which he had previously believed there were no dogs present in the courtyard. According to the account, the resident had visited the address before, and there was no visible sign or fence marking, which contributed to a sense of unexpected risk when, upon entering the communal space, a mastiff charged the person. The incident underscores the broader concerns about pet management in shared living environments and the need for consistent enforcement of safety standards on apartment blocks, courtyards, and similar communal areas. (DEA News)