Russia Considers Expanded Roskomnadzor Powers Over Online Content

No time to read?
Get a summary

According to a draft decision issued by the Russian government, the Ministry of Digital Development, Communications and Mass Media, together with Roskomnadzor, seeks new authority to curb the spread of materials that promote nontraditional sexual relations. The document describes a framework for stronger oversight of online information and wider media messaging, with the aim of reinforcing traditional family values and social norms as defined by state policy. In practical terms, the proposal would empower Roskomnadzor to identify and suppress content it deems propagandistic, particularly on digital platforms and in mass media channels. The move reflects a broader pattern in Russia toward tighter control of information flows and a willingness to limit access to resources considered contrary to the government’s preferred moral framework. The official publication of the draft on the regulatory portal signals the start of a public discussion about these powers and their implications for how information is shared across the internet and other media.

Proponents describe the measure as a targeted response to media abuses rather than a blanket censorship program. The draft would authorize Roskomnadzor to restrict access to websites and services that disseminate information the authorities label illegal or harmful. It would also seek cooperation from online platforms to enforce the rules, including social networks, video sites, and messaging services. The document emphasizes protecting families and preserving traditional values as central purposes of the policy. Advocates contend that stronger oversight is necessary to counter perceived propaganda that targets minors or promotes lifestyles outside the mainstream. Critics warn of potential overreach and a chilling effect on legitimate expression, arguing that broader powers could suppress political discourse and independent journalism. The proposal sits alongside a series of recent moves to tighten information control across both online and traditional media, with enforcement integrated into the national regulatory framework. The plan outlines classification standards, reporting requirements, and penalties, positioning Roskomnadzor as the primary enforcer of compliance within the wider media landscape.

Observers point to concrete enforcement actions as the policy debate unfolds. On March 17, a Moscow student was fined 302 thousand rubles for propagating content related to nontraditional sexual relations on a social network. The case illustrates how emerging rules can translate into real sanctions for online expression and how quickly authorities can respond when new guidance is issued. Students, teachers, and everyday users are reminded that policy developments may redefine what is permissible across various digital forums. Supporters frame such actions as essential to public order, child protection, and consistent messaging across media channels. Analysts expect prosecutions under the evolving framework to become more common as definitions of illegal propaganda become clearer and as regulation extends to more platforms and services.

A separate development concerns a fund once established to support transgender individuals in Moscow. Reports indicate that a funding mechanism intended to assist transgender people and related health and advocacy work was dissolved or reduced in scope. Advocates fear that the loss of funding may leave vulnerable groups without essential services, while supporters of the new policy say resources should be redirected to areas aligned with traditional family values. The shifting landscape signals a broader policy debate about the state’s role in minority support and how social programs fit with the government’s focus on family units and cultural continuity. Observers warn that cutting targeted funding can have lasting consequences for communities that rely on health information, community programs, and advocacy work. As discussions continue, many groups watch how enforcement and funding decisions will interact with the new media regulation framework and the government’s messaging strategy.”

No time to read?
Get a summary
Previous Article

Zelensky and the US-Led Peace Talks: Claims, Conflicts, and Contested Allegiances

Next Article

Video Call Scams: How Fraudsters Steal Verification Codes