Roskomnadzor has taken steps to limit access to information about the sites of several foreign hosting providers, including Amazon Web Services. This move is described by the regulator as a measure tied to enforcing compliance with the landing page requirements under Russian law and its related information controls. The agency states that the action targets search results that point to these foreign providers’ sites, aiming to curb access to content deemed non compliant with landing obligations as defined by the regulator. This explanation is presented by Roskomnadzor as part of its ongoing effort to align search results with national rules and to protect residents from information that fails to meet legal standards. The regulator cites the intention to ensure that search results do not direct users to services that have not fulfilled their legal responsibilities in Russia, thereby guiding user experience toward higher compliance outcomes.
In total, 11 company websites were subjected to the restriction. The list includes Hetzner Online GmbH, Network Solutions LLC, WPEngine Inc, HostGator.com LLC, Ionos Inc, DreamHost LLC, Amazon Web Services Inc, GoDaddy.com LLC, Bluehost Inc, Kamatera Inc, and DigitalOcean LLC. Roskomnadzor emphasizes that these sites are not entirely blocked from the internet but are restricted in terms of how their pages appear in search results within the country. The regulator frames this as a targeted action focused on search indexing and result presentation rather than a blanket ban on the companies’ online services, aligning with the landing policy designed to manage information exposure to Russian users. The stated objective is to reduce access to content that does not comply with the landing requirements while preserving other aspects of the companies’ offerings for users who navigate directly to their sites.
Earlier reports indicate that Go Travel Un Limited, the owner of the Aviasales service, was also added to the roster of foreign entities subject to landing in Russia. This step signals Roskomnadzor’s broader approach to extending landing obligations to a wider range of international service providers, with the regulator noting that noncompliance with landing duties can trigger similar information display restrictions in search results. The agency frames this as part of a systematic effort to enforce national rules across different sectors and to ensure a consistent information environment for Russian internet users. These actions reflect Roskomnadzor’s ongoing policy to harmonize search results with Russian regulatory standards and to encourage foreign providers to meet the required obligations by adhering to local mandates.
Prior to these developments, Roskomnadzor expanded its list to include twelve additional foreign hosting providers as subjects of landing. The expansion underscores the agency’s intent to widen the scope of entities covered by the landing regime and to reinforce the expectations placed on international service operators regarding their compliance with Russian legal requirements. The additions demonstrate a continuing trend of regulatory vigilance aimed at aligning search visibility with national information policies and at signaling consequences for providers that fail to meet the specified obligations. The regulatory stance continues to provoke discussion about how foreign tech firms adapt their operations in response to Russian landing rules and how such rules influence the online information landscape for residents and visitors.
In a related development, Roskomnadzor previously held WhatsApp Messenger accountable for not removing prohibited information in a timely manner. This earlier case illustrates how the landing framework has been applied to major communication platforms, reinforcing the message that compliance with content restrictions and user-facing information controls is a key expectation for all providers operating under Russian jurisdiction. The outcome of that decision highlighted the regulator’s willingness to enforce penalties or adjustments in information presentation when required by law, reinforcing the broader objective of maintaining information governance standards across services accessible to the Russian audience.
For observers, the pattern of actions signals a persistent effort to harmonize international service availability with domestic regulatory requirements. Roskomnadzor’s statements indicate a strategic aim to influence how foreign hosting providers manage their search visibility and information presentation within Russia rather than to curtail their global operations entirely. The practical effect for users is a more curated search experience that favors providers and pages in compliance with landing rules, along with a broader reminder to operators about the importance of aligning with local legal frameworks. Analysts and industry watchers note that the dynamic reflects ongoing negotiations between national information governance and global services, with implications for search behavior, internet architecture, and cross-border digital policy as commercial and technical ecosystems continue to interact in the Russian market. Attribution: Roskomnadzor declarations and regulatory communications are cited in coverage of these developments. The regulator’s position remains a focal point for discussions about how landing obligations shape online information availability in the region.