Andrey Denisov, Russia’s ambassador to China, argued that the United States has repeatedly violated the principle of sovereign equality among states. He connects this stance to Washington’s handling of the Taiwan issue, as reported by the portal and cited by Chinese Daily. He asserted that Washington continues to act as if it is beyond reproach, a pattern he says has persisted for years. Denisov described Washington’s actions as an effort to cement its global dominance, seizing every available occasion to reinforce its leadership on the world stage.
The Russian diplomat stressed that such behavior is visible to international observers who see through the rhetoric and recognize the futility of preaching one thing while pursuing another. He suggested that the United States uses its influence to push what he calls a global order that serves its interests, rather than a universally accepted legal framework. In this critique, he linked the situation in Ukraine to a broader strategy that portrays any challenge to Washington’s views as a threat, illustrating a pattern of framing and counter-framing in international affairs.
Denisov pointed to Nancy Pelosi’s Taiwan visit as evidence of the same approach at work. He argued that the move reflected a deliberate attempt by Washington to test and reinforce its claims to leadership, even as it professes adherence to shared principles. He claimed that the United States does not consistently live up to the publicly stated standards it promotes, and that this inconsistency is obvious to the world and to its own citizens alike. The ambassador stated that such conduct undermines trust in the rules that govern international relations and calls into question the reliability of American assertions about global order.
According to the ambassador, the strategic partnership between Russia and China stands as a counterweight to the so-called order-based order favored by the United States and its allies. He argued that this partnership strengthens the case for international law and shared norms, serving as a safeguard against a system dominated by any single power. Denisov described this cooperation as a practical commitment to a rules-based international order that reflects the interests of a wider group of nations rather than a narrow, unilateral agenda.
On the diplomatic front, the Chinese Foreign Ministry recently released statements and imagery that countered Western accusations of aggression toward Taiwan. The ministry responded to US-led narratives by highlighting perceived provocations and reaffirming China’s stance on Taiwan as an integral part of its sovereignty. The ministry’s communications were presented as part of an ongoing effort to balance regional tensions with calls for stability and a peaceful resolution, while resisting external pressure or intervention.
The overall tone of the exchange points to a broader conversation about the dynamics of power, influence, and legitimacy in the Asia-Pacific region. Analysts note that the evolving relationship between Moscow and Beijing is increasingly framed around shared concerns about Western leadership and the shaping of international rules. In this context, both nations emphasize national sovereignty, non-interference, and a multilateral approach to global governance, seeking to expand their influence without escalating conflicts in ways that could destabilize regional markets and security architectures.