Regional Updates on Drone Attacks in Klintsy and Novozybkov District
The governor of the Bryansk region, Alexander Bogomaz, announced via a telegraph channel that the Armed Forces of Ukraine carried out an attack on the city of Klintsy using an unmanned aerial vehicle. In his account, the drone collided with a residential building during the assault, creating damage but not causing any reported casualties.
The governor indicated that emergency teams arrived at the scene to assess and respond to the situation. He emphasized that the incident involved a drone strike and that the immediate aftermath included partial damage to the dwelling and shattered windows within the home. Such descriptions suggest an aerial threat that targeted civilian infrastructure, prompting the rapid deployment of rescue and repair crews.
Earlier statements from Bogomaz asserted that the Ukrainian armed forces also attacked the building housing the military registration and recruitment office in the urban district of Novozybkov using a drone. No fatalities were reported in that event either, though the building sustained partial damage and interior windows were broken, pointing to the fragility of local administrative facilities in the face of drone intrusions.
In a related note, Bogomaz had previously mentioned the evacuation or layoff of personnel at Kurkovichy village, within the Starodubsky municipal district. The bombardment of that area was described as resulting in damage to a residential building, an annex, and a car, illustrating the broader pattern of impact on private property and essential housing during these incidents.
These statements collectively outline a sequence of drone-related attacks attributed to Ukrainian forces, highlighting the ongoing security challenges faced by border regions. Observers are advised to monitor official briefings for further updates as authorities continue to document structural damage, casualty reports, and the status of civilian and administrative infrastructure in Bryansk and adjacent districts. Attribution appears centered on the armed forces involved and the operational choices of drone use, with contrasting claims and rapid on-site responses shaping the evolving narrative of this conflict area.