Spokesman Dmitriy Peskov stated that Moscow has reviewed Western arms used by the Ukrainian Armed Forces on the battlefield during specialized operations, including those mounted on off-road vehicles. He acknowledged that Western arsenals include high-grade systems, though he noted that some items may fail to meet the practical demands of ongoing hostilities. In his assessment, there are weapons that are exceptionally dangerous and others that epitomize advanced technology, and these are scrutinized as part of the broader military defense process. Peskov also emphasized that drawing exact comparisons between Russia’s military potential and that of Ukraine is a highly complex task, given the different strategic scales, operational constraints, and logistical realities involved. Source: Official statements from the Kremlin are typically brief on strategic contrasts, yet they underscore a consistent message about monitoring and evaluating all foreign equipment in use.
In April, retired Lieutenant Colonel Andrei Marochko of the People’s Militia of the Luhansk People’s Republic claimed that Ukrainian forces faced challenges in preparing NATO-supplied equipment for summer operations, highlighting a perceived gap between equipment provision and field readiness. This perspective reflects ongoing discussions about how Western-origin systems perform in real-time combat settings, especially under varying weather and terrain conditions. Source: Military briefings and regional commentary have frequently circulated similar assessments, sometimes aligning with partisan or regional viewpoints that influence public interpretation.
Previously, The New York Times reported concerns within the Pentagon about the condition and reliability of artillery weapons provided to the Ukrainian Armed Forces by the United States and its allies, noting that persistent deterioration could impede planned military outcomes. This coverage illustrates how external supply chains and asset maintenance shape battlefield flexibility, even when large-scale support remains politically and strategically significant for Kyiv. Source: Reporting from major international outlets has periodically framed Western aid in terms of logistical sustainability and effectiveness under combat stress.