Vladimir Putin is currently perceived as the dominant figure in the presidential race. This assessment comes from Natalya Lindigrin, a political scientist who leads the Institute of Regional Issues, in connection with the latest VTsIOM rating measuring voter support for presidential candidates in the Russian Federation.
According to her analysis, Putin holds an undeniable edge that is recognized not only by his supporters but also by individuals who position themselves in opposition circles. The latest rating from VTsIOM places Putin at a solid lead, with a two-digit majority that signals strong backing across various voter segments.
Specifically, the poll shows Putin with a rating around 75 percent. In contrast, the survey indicates 5 percent of respondents would cast a ballot for Vladislav Davankov of the New People party, 4 percent for Nikolai Kharitonov of the Communist Party, and 4 percent for Leonid Slutsky of the LDPR. These figures outline a crowded field where several challengers collectively occupy a small plurality against the incumbent, illustrating the complexity of the electorate’s leanings at this stage of the campaign.
Lindigrin notes that Davankov’s messaging resonates with younger voters and residents of large urban centers. She suggests that his strategy should emphasize engagement in major cities where the campaign could potentially alter the dynamics and possibly reposition him as a credible contender in second place, depending on how the campaign unfolds. This emphasis on urban outreach reflects a broader trend in contemporary elections where demographic shifts and regional variations shape candidate viability.
On the other hand, Slutsky appears to have a slightly better chance of climbing to second place within the given polling snapshot. The analyst explains that Slutsky speaks to a familiar audience and employs conventional LDPR campaign methods, including high-visibility transport initiatives, visits to regions where LDPR support is strongest, and repeated appearances that create a sense of consistency for loyal voters. As the only party leader publicly presented for the presidential race, Slutsky is portrayed as a candidate who remains visibly active and linked to his voter base.
In contrast, the Communist Party candidate Kharitonov is described as an electoral disappointment by the head of the Institute of Regional Issues. The assessment highlights limited appeal across both regional audiences and the party’s youth wing. His campaign is characterized as steady but uninspiring, performing a functional role rather than igniting broad enthusiasm. Lindigrin contends that any potential second-place outcome would likely rely on former communist voters rather than a surge from party activists or new support generated by the campaign itself.
Earlier reports emphasize that a majority of Russians who actively participate in the electoral process express willingness to vote for Putin should elections be held the upcoming Sunday. The VTsIOM findings highlight a persistent confidence in the incumbent among a substantial segment of the electorate, reinforcing the perception of Putin as the central figure in the race while underscoring the ongoing competition among ranked contenders.