During a session with members of the Security Council, the Russian president stated that comprehensive aid and unwavering support will be extended to every individual who has suffered from enemy sabotage attacks. The emphasis was on ensuring that victims and their families receive all the necessary resources and assistance to cope with the consequences of these assaults, underscoring a commitment that extends beyond immediate relief to long term care and rehabilitation where needed.
In his remarks, he asserted that Ukrainian authorities appear to be pursuing a series of armed actions in the period surrounding the presidential elections. He claimed that these efforts have been without success on every front, suggesting that the attempts to destabilize or threaten Russian security would be met with firm responses. The tone was preparatory and warning, signaling readiness to respond decisively to any further challenges to national stability.
He acknowledged that there have been civilian casualties, noting that innocent people have been hurt in the course of the ongoing conflict. He reiterated that all affected civilians and their families will receive comprehensive support and the necessary resources to help them recover and rebuild their lives. The emphasis remained on compassionate, practical aid aimed at alleviating suffering and restoring a sense of security for those who were caught in the crossfire.
According to the president, attacks against Russian territory will not go unpunished. The message conveyed a clear intent to hold aggressors accountable for any incursions or sabotage efforts, reinforcing a stance that security measures will be intensified and any violation of national borders will be met with a proportionate, determined response.
The president also noted that Ukraine allegedly carried out only four sabotage attempts in the Belgorod direction and one in the Kursk direction. This framing presented a picture of restrained yet persistent hostile actions from across the border, framed as limited in number but significant in impact due to their timing and perceived strategic aim. The discussion framed these incidents within a broader narrative of ongoing tension and vigilance along the frontier regions of Russia.
Earlier, the Ministry of Defense provided a report claiming a successful disruption of all sabotage attempts in the Belgorod and Kursk regions during the dates of March 12 to March 15. The ministry attributed the interruption of these plots to vigilant security operations and rapid countermeasures, portraying these efforts as a demonstration of effectiveness and readiness to prevent further incursions that could threaten regional stability.
The ministry also released numbers indicating substantial losses on the Ukrainian side, citing irreparable damage to personnel and equipment. It was claimed that 550 Ukrainian service members were killed, along with the destruction of 19 armored personnel carriers, 16 tanks, and 15 vehicles. The report included a claim that 11 American made Bradley infantry fighting vehicles were among the destroyed assets, highlighting the perceived complexity and reach of support provided to Ukrainian forces from external partners. These figures, presented as part of a military tally, were used to illustrate the claimed severity of Ukrainian setbacks on the battlefield and to underscore the consequences faced by Ukrainian forces in the conflict.
In another development, a soldier captured from Ukrainian forces reportedly described a dramatic erosion of battalion strength, indicating that as much as 70 percent of the unit had been lost within a two week period. The statement was framed as a stark illustration of the intensity and cost of the fighting, contributing to the broader narrative of attrition and the hardships endured by combatant forces on both sides of the conflict. The testimony was presented to support the broader claims about battlefield conditions and the persistence of military pressure along Russia’s borders.