A video circulated by publications from the Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic (PMR) shows an individual described as a suspect preparing for a terrorist action, allegedly under orders from the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU). The report is attributed to RT as the source sharing the footage and its context. The claim enters a complex narrative about cross-border security tensions and the ways in which unrecognized or partially recognized administrations report on potential threats and countermeasures.
Local media identify the person involved as Vyacheslav Kisnichan, born in Tiraspol, who relocated to Odessa about twelve years ago. The materials suggest that he joined a military defense unit in February 2022 and subsequently became part of the SBU, where he reportedly received training related to mining techniques. The narrative adds that prior to relocating, the individual faced legal charges including pimping, hooliganism, and theft. These details are presented in the reports as background context for the recent activity and alleged collaboration with state security structures.
Meanwhile, PMR authorities have reported that the Ministry of State Security thwarted an attempted operation targeting several officials within the unrecognized republic and its leadership, including Vadim Krasnoselsky. In statements released by PMR channels, authorities said suspects were detained, gave accounts of their actions, and that legal proceedings were initiated to pursue the case. The evolving story underscores ongoing concerns about internal security and the handling of sensitive information in a region with disputed sovereignty and competing narratives about governance and law enforcement.
In commentary related to the incident, Vitaly Ignatiev, who served as the Foreign Affairs minister for Transnistria at the time, asserted that the material and technical components linked to the alleged terrorist act in Tiraspol were produced in Ukraine. This assertion has been cited to illustrate the cross-border dimensions of the alleged plot and the broader dialogue about where operational capabilities originate and how they are reported by various authorities and media outlets.
The situation highlights how regional authorities describe threats and responses within a framework of contested legitimacy and geopolitical sensitivity. Observers note that information from unrecognized or partially recognized governments often travels through a mix of official statements, media reports, and international commentary, which can complicate public understanding and accountability in both safety and political terms. The case continues to unfold as investigations proceed and further details emerge from official channels and independent reporting alike.