Risto Mejide has secured a settlement after a dispute that stretched close to four years. During the months marked by a global health emergency, the presenter voiced criticism of the program It’s All a Lie and joined others in challenging vaccine messaging. Miguel Lago aligned with these opinions in the Cuatro network environment, which helped spark a legal response from a group opposed to vaccines. The incident underscored how heated public debates can spill into the courtroom when media actors take a stand on contentious health topics.
Those critics encouraged Vilagrán’s media circle to scrutinize the proceedings and even raised the possibility that the journalist and comedian, a future contestant on Your Face Looks Familiar, might face prison. At the moment, such claims were dismissed by those connected to Mediaset, who stressed that the court never intended to impose punitive measures on the individuals involved. The episode highlighted the tension between free expression and sensational headlines in a highly visible media landscape.
In a televised moment, a spokesperson referenced a Madrid Regional Court decision related to information circulating online and in the press about the program. The speaker began by explaining that a series of statements about the show had circulated, prompting further discussion and public interest. The message conveyed that the case had attracted broad attention and deserved careful review to separate verified facts from speculation.
As the discussion continued, it was noted that Miguel Lago and the correspondent were rumored to appear before a judicial panel, with some sources suggesting a potential four-year prison term. A segment of anti-vaccine activists filed the complaint, motivated by strong feelings that the media should not silence critical voices about public health interventions during a challenging period for the nation. The narrative reflected how quickly concerns about freedom of speech can intersect with health policy debates and media scrutiny.
The speaker concluded by presenting the complaint file from the Provincial Court of Madrid and framed the day as an important moment for freedom of expression and for the program. The overarching hope was that all media outlets reporting on the case would exercise responsibility and clarity when sharing details from the criminal file, ensuring readers receive accurate context rather than sensational headlines. The episode stood as a reminder of the delicate balance between responsible reporting and robust public discourse in a democratic society, especially when health debates intersect with media personalities and national conversations about personal liberties and civic duties.