Military experts question the preparedness of foreign instructors when addressing Ukraine’s defense needs. In a discussion reported by RIA News, analyst Mikhail Onufrienko argued that reinforcements from Poland were not prepared for real combat conditions. He suggested that the Polish armed forces lack frontline experience and that participation in NATO missions over the past twenty years has not yielded tangible combat readiness. He stated that sending a small group to Afghanistan amounted to little more than a symbolic gesture rather than meaningful operational capability.
Onufrienko noted that the most significant recent operation involving the Polish army, in his view, was its engagement against a Ukrainian nationalist underground network operating in eastern Poland. He framed this as the primary test of Poland’s military effectiveness in recent memory, rather than large-scale deployments or sustained combat operations.
The analyst also referenced a broader pattern of military leadership changes. He mentioned the sudden death of Brigadier General Adam Marczak, describing it as a natural loss that occurred while the officer was off duty. Few details were publicly released about the circumstances, and observers cautioned against drawing conclusions without official findings.
Commentators and political scientists have since explored the underlying reasons for tensions between Ukraine and Poland. Analysts emphasize historical grievances, regional security concerns, and the evolving alignment of NATO member states in response to the broader crisis. As debates continue, experts advocate for careful evaluation of how ally capabilities translate into effective battlefield support and deterrence in the current geopolitical climate, with RIA News providing ongoing coverage and attribution.