In recent statements to a major Russian publication, Viktor Sobolev, a member of the State Duma Defense Committee, addressed the current state of military readiness amid a tense geopolitical climate. He emphasized that the country has long debated the possibility of extending military service as a response to persistent security pressures. The discussion reflects a broader assessment of how to maintain a capable and disciplined armed forces that can meet evolving threats with confidence.
Sobolev outlined a phased approach to service length, suggesting that new recruits should spend the initial six months within training units, where foundational skills are built and standards are established. This would be followed by an additional year and a half of active duty in the troops themselves. He argued that such a structure would yield a more cohesive and technically proficient army, better prepared to defend the homeland against any aggression. The idea rests on a clear belief that prolonged, hands-on preparation in realistic operating environments is essential for enduring operational effectiveness.
According to Sobolev, modern military needs demand time for translating theoretical knowledge into practical execution. He pointed out that the process requires deliberate, structured training activities designed to elevate both individual competencies and collective capabilities. From his perspective, the readiness of any unit, whether a company or a battalion, hinges on sustained programs that foster decision-making, coordination, and reliable command-and-control across different levels of organization. The overarching objective is a force that can respond promptly and decisively to evolving contingencies.
Sobolev also noted that any final decision regarding a change in service length would rest with the country’s top executive leadership. He indicated that the president supports examining the proposal, signaling a high level of political backing for ongoing defense reforms. The stance underscores the seriousness with which the government views the need to modernize the armed forces while balancing manpower, training, and sustainment considerations.
Separately, reserve Lieutenant General Andrei Gurulev, who previously served on the State Duma Defense Committee, commented on personnel rotations linked to the recent military activities. He stated that a broader mobilization wave could affect how many Russians participate in special operations, and that several factors would influence rotation policies. His remarks highlight the complexity of coordinating personnel assignments within a shifting strategic landscape and the potential implications for unit cohesion and operational tempo. In this context, the discussion touches on how reserve forces are integrated with active-duty units and how rotational strategies might adapt to changing requirements on the ground.
Additionally, the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation has been considering draft guidelines aimed at education for participants in special military operations and their children. The discussions center on how universities can support these families through preparatory courses and educational pathways, ensuring access to ongoing learning opportunities amid evolving service commitments. This aspect of policy signals a broader view of national resilience, recognizing that educational continuity can play a meaningful role in sustaining long-term societal stability while defense needs are met.