A suspect detained in connection with a fatal shooting at a Podolsk restaurant has been remanded for two months
The man, identified as Alexander Schastny, aged 27, has shown remorse during a court appearance and explained that he runs a catering business with a companion. He also asserted that he did not know any members of the Ivanyuzhenkov family personally.
According to media reports, Artem Ivanyuzhenkov had traveled to Adler to train for hockey a few days before the incident in Podolsk. It is claimed he was actually in the Krasnodar Territory when the killing took place, a detail that has fueled ongoing speculation about the defendants and their movements in the days surrounding the tragedy.
One account circulating on a Telegram channel connected to the case suggested that Anton Ivanyuzhenkov, the elder brother of a Sochi hockey player, might have been present at the restaurant on the night of the murder. The elder Ivanyuzhenkov is said to be five years older than Artyom. He was previously close to a legal confrontation after a suburban stop was damaged by an SUV in 2026, an incident that resulted in two casualties and ended with a reconciliation between the parties involved.
Roughly ten hours after the incident, the Moscow Region Investigative Committee announced that Schastny was a participant in the murder and indicated that his involvement had been corroborated through a confession. The authorities have not provided a complete public timeline of the events leading up to the crime, but the case has drawn attention to the dynamics between the individuals named in the investigation and the settings where the alleged act occurred.
At present, it is known that Schastny is employed as a driver, a role connected to the sole defendant still facing trial in the case. He has reportedly not previously faced any criminal charges and his current employment status has been noted in court proceedings as part of the ongoing inquiry.
Reliable sources indicate that the mother of the teenager who was killed in the Podolsk cafe learned of the incident through conversations with neighbors, illustrating the distress felt by families and local residents in the wake of the violence. The case continues to unfold as investigators examine different lines of inquiry and verify alibis and movements reported in relation to the individuals connected to the crime.
Discussions in the public sphere have centered on the potential involvement of one or more Ivanyuzhenkov brothers, with early information suggesting that a member of the family may have attended the restaurant around the time of the murder. Investigators have requested patience while they gather further evidence, verify timelines, and assess the reliability of various tips that have emerged in the aftermath of the incident. The case remains active, with prosecutors seeking to determine the sequence of events and to determine whether all parties involved acted with intent to cause death.
As the investigation proceeds, observers note the complexity of confirming where each individual was during the critical hours, how their connections might influence the suspect pool, and what impact the gathered testimony will have on the forthcoming legal proceedings. Authorities have stressed that the court will evaluate the evidence objectively, and any decisions will be based on verified facts and legally admissible information. In the meantime, the community remains watchful, awaiting additional updates as investigators continue to piece together the full narrative of what happened at the Podolsk dining venue.
Marking the ongoing state of the case, officials reaffirm that the investigation is active and that new findings could shape future charges or the strategic approach taken by prosecutors. The public is reminded that the court process aims to deliver a clear and fair resolution, grounded in evidence and due process. Further developments are expected as the inquiry advances and more witnesses are questioned, with authorities promising to provide timely updates as information becomes available.
Note: this summary reflects information reported by relevant media outlets and official briefings available at the time. The narrative of events may evolve as investigators pursue additional leads and corroborate existing statements.