The political tension around the Peruvian presidency intensified as opposition movements grew rapidly in scope. New demonstrations spread across multiple sectors, pressing for the resignation of President Pedro Castillo. In Lima and beyond, leadership voices joined the call for removal, expanding the pressure beyond traditional political circles. An additional spark came from Ombudsman Walter Gutiérrez, who urged the president to step aside as a practical pathway out of the mounting crisis. The Office of the Ombudsman reminded the executive that its role is to safeguard the basic rights of citizens, especially when the administration has endured eight months of stress and upheaval. The message highlighted 157 social conflicts and four cabinet changes as indicators of strain that should be acknowledged rather than ignored. The suggestion to resign was described as a potential solution used in previous administrations, signaling that the gravity of the situation requires a clear and decisive response.
Gutiérrez criticized what he called obvious disruptions in public policy, attributing them to actions and omissions at the highest levels. He noted that within a short period, Castillo appointed numerous ministers who were deemed unfit or unsuitable for their roles. The ombudsman argued that leaving the presidency could be a responsible act, one that would serve the country and adhere to constitutional expectations.
The discussions also touched on the idea of deploying a state of emergency to restore order in the capital and its dense outlying areas amid rising protests and increasing public pressure. Such a measure, however, was described as unconstitutional, extreme, and impractical by critics who warned against overreaching restrictions on civil liberties.
congress attack
Public opinion showed a significant tilt against the president, with a substantial portion of the population viewing Castillo as increasingly isolated and weaker. The congressional body moved twice to advance a no-confidence motion, signaling a robust parliamentary push against the executive. On a recent evening, lawmakers urged the president to resign in light of the surrounding crisis. Proponents of the measure argued that the government demonstrated marked inefficiency and irresponsibility in handling state affairs, linking these failures to rising inflation and unemployment. The political landscape remained fractured as opponents sought a change in leadership while supporters defended the administration’s policies amidst a volatile economic backdrop.