The recent discovery of unusual dolls during a Peruvian customs inspection bound for Mexico turned out to be rooted in earthly materials, not extraterrestrial origins. Forensic experts reviewing the seizure reports concluded that the figures were manufactured from a mix of human and animal bones, paper, glue, and metal, with the construction incorporating modern adhesive. These findings led investigators to conclude that the dolls were assembled in recent times rather than during pre-Hispanic eras. The assessment was reported by the Associated Press, drawing on the work of forensic specialists who examined the evidence surrounding the case.
According to the forensic analysis, the dolls show a blend of tangible components rather than any ancient or otherworldly craftsmanship. The presence of bone fragments alongside everyday industrial materials, such as contemporary glue, indicates a more recent origin. As a result, experts believe the objects were put together in recent years, not centuries ago, which shifts the narrative away from a long-lost civilization and toward a modern fabrication scenario.
The investigation by Peruvian authorities remains ongoing to determine ownership of the seized items from 2023. Officials indicated that the intended recipient was identified as a Mexican citizen, but the exact holder of the objects had not yet been established. The case remains under scrutiny as prosecutors work to trace the chain of custody and verify the transfer details associated with the shipment.
In early September 2023, a group of ufologists, including journalist Jaime Maussan, presented two objects allegedly found in Peru to the Mexican Parliament, labeling them as foreign objects. These objects also displayed three fingers on each hand. The public presentation sparked debate and media attention, with supporters arguing they could be evidence of otherworldly contact, while critics questioned the authenticity and interpretation of the findings.
Maussan subsequently asserted that the finds dated roughly a thousand years back. Critics, however, have accused him of portraying man-made artifacts as alien relics to attract attention or influence public discourse. The controversy highlights the broader tension between sensational claims and rigorous scientific verification in the sphere of unexplained artifacts.
Earlier discussions in the Mexican Parliament included statements about alien remains in Peru, which further fueled debate among researchers and skeptics alike. The evolving narrative demonstrates how cultural artifacts can be interpreted in multiple ways, depending on the presentation, the available evidence, and the framing by various parties with divergent interests. The Peruvian case thus stands as a focal point for examining methodologies in artifact authentication, provenance tracking, and the responsibilities of investigators when claims touch on the possibility of extraterrestrial involvement.