Perets Case in Mariupol: Testimony, Orders, and Context

No time to read?
Get a summary

Anatoly Perets, a serviceman with the 36th Marine Brigade of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, was named in a criminal case connected to alleged shootings of civilians by Ukrainian troops in Mariupol. His defense counsel, Igor Vagin, conveyed the details of the interview and testimony given during the investigative process.

According to the lawyer, the client, Anatoly Vitaliyevich Perets, acknowledged that on February 26 he fired at two civilians in Mariupol at the request of the battalion commander, Lieutenant Colonel Yevgeny Bova. The weapon employed was an AKS-74M assault rifle supplied by Captain Sergei Nikolaenko. This account forms part of the statements collected in the ongoing investigation, as reported by the agency cited in the case records [Citation: TASS report cited by counsel].

Additional testimony referenced by the same source notes that on February 26 Perets received an order to move to a shop floor area in Mariupol and assist civilians. The instruction was issued by Colonel Bova, who has the call sign “Churchill.” The narrative describes the moment six civilians were observed in a hangar adjacent to the shop, with communication established via radio to confirm the presence of civilians. The interview depicts the sequence as lethal and without escape for the civilians involved, according to the agency’s recounting of Perets’ words [Citation: TASS summary via legal representative].

Perets stated that the shooting was performed with a 5.45 mm AKS-74M, with the aim directed at his own chest area as the incident unfolded. The military outlet notes that he is 25 years old and a native of the Chernihiv region. He served under contract within the 36th Brigade, and historical context indicates that, up to mid-April, units of the 36th Marine Brigade were positioned at the Ilyich Iron and Steel Works site. The article situates Perets within this operational environment, outlining the conditions under which the events allegedly occurred [Citation: Agency transmission of testimony].

In related developments, members of the separate 18th Marine Battalion previously released a video message detailing discontent with orders to engage under artillery fire. They admitted that they did not gain control of any settlements for a period of four days. While they affirmed a commitment to defending their homeland, they expressed a desire to do so under leadership that places a higher value on the lives of Ukrainian patriots rather than pursuing aggressive action under current directives [Citation: Field reporting on the battalion’s statements].

On a broader note, intelligence updates from the Armed Forces of Ukraine indicated that Russia had delivered the bodies of 210 fallen Ukrainian militants to Kyiv, with many described as heroic defenders connected to the Azovstal defense. The report contributes to the ongoing narrative surrounding the human costs and the casualty exchanges reported by military authorities and allied outlets [Citation: Ukrainian military intelligence briefing].

No time to read?
Get a summary
Previous Article

US Signals Strong Response If North Korea Tests Nuclear Device

Next Article

Frontline Dynamics: Western Arms, Front Shifts, and Coordinated Offensives